Hi,
schaust du bei diesem Weg nochmal nach den beiden lanes* Tags? Da ist etwas schiefgegangen.
way/297874842

Gruss, Jan

Hi,
the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset.
Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
kannst du nochmal nach dem Tagging schauen '_vertical' ist ein ungewöhnlicher Key.

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
could you explain the "housename" on this building?
way/332283894

Cheers, Jan

Hallo,
kannst du nochmal über diese 3 Relationen schauen? Eine ist nicht geschlossen, alle drei haben keinen Namen

osm.org/browse/relation/7159115
osm.org/browse/relation/7159792
osm.org/browse/relation/7159745

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki.

Cheers, Jan

Alright, I wasn't aware of this. I stumbled across it because of a spelling mistake: railway:signal:main:f should be railway:signal:main:form, I think.

Hi,
these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g.
ACCESSIBLE
ADDRESS
ADDRESS_FR
NAME_FR
NOTES

Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan

Hallo,
du erfindest hier (mal wieder) Unmengen an neuen Tags. Bitte informiere dich über gängige Tags. In der jetztigen Form sind diese Informationen absolut nutzlos.
Beispiele:
bicycle situation
bicycle designating Sign
Bicycle path color to walkway
cycle end
cycle path quality
cyclepath_steady
cycleway color
cycling prohibited
cyclist
Cyclist's traffic light
Cyclist-free sign

Hi,
could you check this building, it has many strange tags:
way/486855572

Cheers, Jan

I don't think we do distinguish between street lamps and path lamps. Until we come up with a distinction, I opt for tagging them with the common tag to make them visible on existing maps.

Hi,
something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...
Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.

Jan

Hi,
you put some urls to maps in the tags of these objects. I assume you used these as the source of your edits? To you have an permit to use these maps or are these licensed under a license compatible to ODbL?

Jan

Hi,
it's a bit strange that this railway in Greece uses German signaling. Could you check that? node/4790883029
Jan

Hallo,
du hast hier das highway-Tag entfernt, aber es laufen noch einige Wanderrouten über diesen Weg. Wie sieht das vor Ort wirklich aus?
way/23325729

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you added more than 6000 buildings with a misspelled house number tag: "adr:housenumber" instead of "addr:housenumber". Could you have a look and fix that? Let me know if you need help.

Jan

Hi,
you added some nodes with tags light "light_source". Street lamps usually are tagged with "highway=street_lamp", which should be there additional to your tags. Would you mind adding it?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
there are six nodes like this one:
node/4784899723
They don't have any common tag. Could you have a look?

Jan

Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers?
way/485498407
The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange.
Jan

Hi,
I found 80 buildings with many foreign tags like the ones shown below.
I don't think they belong into the OSM database - can they be removed?

Cheers, Jan

ADAT=2013-05-08 09:04
ANDAMAL_1=130
ANDAMAL_10=0
ANDAMAL_1T=Bostad; Småhus friliggande
ANDAMAL_2=0
ANDAMAL_3=0
ANDAMAL_4=0
ANDAMAL_5=0
ANDAMAL_6=0
ANDAMAL_7=0
ANDAMAL_8=0
ANDAMAL_9=0
DETALJTYP=HUS
FNR_BR=60000047554
INSAM_LAGE=0
OBJEKT_ID=acec9ce0-4caa-477e-b216-a62e8980d1bf
OBJEKT_VER=3
XYFEL=1000