Alright. I'll change the tag "Fraile = Fraile" to "name = Fraile".

Hi,
could you check this tagging? The maxspeed tag is strange:
openstreetmap.org/way/490097570

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
hier sind einige Wege mit dem Tag "30=177" entstanden. Schaust du da nochmal nach?
way/35780993#map=17/47.84284/16.68863

Gruss, Jan

Hi,
could you check this tagging? Is Frailes the name?
way/171545533

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added the key "building_material" to 127 objects. The usual spelling is "building:material" with ':' instead of '_'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan

Moin,
was heißt denn "Alfie=Allen" an 30 Bäumen hier?
Gruß, Jan

Hi,
kannst du mal nach dieser Straße schauen? Du hast ihr "maxspeed=50;30" verpasst, aber nur ein Wert kann stimmen.
way/29341035

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
meintest du hier eventuell "springy"? "swingy" ist mir unbekannt.
node/4738337035

Gruß, Jan

Your tagging is fine. Just a spelling mistake:
You write: "crown_type:"
But it should be: "crown_type"

Indeed, it does. Since 7 days at least.
There is an extensive discussion on the talk page: osm.wiki/Talk:Date_specification

Hi,
could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki.

Cheers, Jan

Until this schema has been adopted, we have to stick to the old scheme, otherwise we lose information. I.e. both tags have to exist in parallel.
But, I really doubt that any tool will use this tagging, based on a 4 year old draft without even an RFC.

Hi,
I'm not aware of any tool that makes use of these tags. For most applications the tagged address was unusable. The existence of another node close by with address information is not sufficient to find the actual address of this POI.
The only case how addresses of another object can be used on a POI is when the POI is inside an area object (e.g. building) with the address. In any other case the result would be ambiguous and not reliable.

Hi,
could you have a look to 40 trees added in this changeset? They have the tag "crown_type:=I"
Note the ':' in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
this changeset created 9 relations with no common tags - could you check this and replace the foreign keys with common ones if necesseary?

Cheers, Jan

Ja, der Verdacht liegt nahe ;-) Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.

Hi,
could you check this node, it has a strange tag:
node/4806907046
80-84= 41-55

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added some strange tags to objects, e.g.
way/488399710
"Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this?

Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map.

Cheers, Jan

Yes, sure. It was my mistake.

You're right. Looks like somebody wants to distinguish between phone service in Italian language (:it) and an phone number to be reached from Italy only (:IT). Kind of makes sense but is hard to remember.