Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry.

Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.

Ja, ideal ist das vorhandene Schema nicht. Ich denke, sowas sollte mal in größerer Runde diskutiert werden, z.B. im Forum mit ein paar gut ausgewählten Beispielen.
Das beste Tagging nützt ja am Ende nichts, wenn es die Auswerter nicht umsetzen wollen oder können.

Servus,
ich finde hier mehrmals "lity = sign" - sieht irgendwie nach Tippfehler aus.
Gruß, Jan

"cost" -> "fee"
"interval" -> "time_interval"
"duration" -> "maxstay"
"vehicle" und "user" gibt es nicht, das muss über condition angegeben werden wenn es Einschränkungen gibt.

Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße selbst, dann ergibt sich das mit :left und :right von alleine. Es ist kein Problem, die vorhandene Straße in mehrere Teilstücke aufzuteilen wenn die parking-Tags sich entlang der Strecke ändern.

Jan

DWG = Data Working Group, the guys who gave you this block: osm.org/user_blocks/1293

lost information - this is very hard to find, given that you retagged thousands of stores and you have to look in the history of these nodes
"removing an established tagging scheme completely" - you removed tags that were well documented since years (see the wiki link you gave) and used by many people. Now every tool that uses these tags is broken.

"not been used at all before" - tags like 'motorcycle:repair' did not appear in the database until you started retagging stores. Thus, it's very likely that not a single tool out there is interpreting this tag at all.

Hallo,
du hast hier eine Tags neu erfunden, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden:

parking:condition:cost
parking:condition:duration
parking:condition:note
parking:condition:user parking:condition:vehicle

Bitte schau mal im Wiki nach den üblichen Tags:
osm.wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane

Gruß, Jan

What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.

Hi,
all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place:
tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL
What does it mean?
Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
what are all these tags you put on 250++ ways? They are new, not used anywhere else and don't seem to be documented.

escala=drenajes a 1:25000
estado_dre=5102
fecha_modi=08/04/2015
responsabl=Alejandra Gómez Sarmiento
ruleid=1
vigencia=0

Thanks, Jan

Hi,
'abandoned' is written 'abandoned' and not 'abandonded'. Could you have a look and correct this on >60 objects?
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added more than 120 buildings with the misspelled key 'buiilding'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Jan

Ok, did in this changeset:
changeset/47486023

Hi,
I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?

Even then, this has to be discussed beforehand (as you were told by the DWG this afternoon).
- > 600 objects edited worldwide within a single day
- in the ~ 10 cases I checked, some information was lost (e.g. used bikes and new bikes sales replaced by a single 'sales' tag)
- there are tags with spelling mistakes
- you're removing an established tagging scheme completely.
- you changed tagging to a scheme that has not been used at all before.

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?

numero_pis=1
numero_sot=0
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL
tipo_domin=PRIVADO

Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)
Could you have a look and fix this?
Jan

Hi,
could you check this way? way/377910114

The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.
Jan

Could you please point me to the discussion page of this mechanical edit?

Hi,
could you check the name tag:
node/4766343316

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you check the tagging of this building?
"Arme = Klarenstraat"
way/70840140

Jan

Hallo,
du benutzt hier 70x den key "generator:mode" - das sollte eigentlich "generator:method" heißen. Korrigierst du das noch?

Grüße, Jan