Confirming buildings are in the process of being demolished

Confirming library is closed for good

Confirmed with Mapillary imagery. Interesting how DCS NSW Base Map says it's Albert Street.

Hi - you should either map the steps along the way, or tag it as wheelchair=no, else routers will try to use it for mobility impaired users.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97629249

Minus the 4 conflate comment. I hit delete but JOSM didn't remove the text.

Ahoy, should it be Creek not Cgreek?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97520465

Hi, you deleted the address data along with the node. I would have expected the removal of business data, leaving address data behind.

See also: osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Australian_Shared_Path_.28bicycle_and_pedestrian_sign.29

Hi - I see bicycle=permissive on a lot of your new paths. If these are marked as shared paths (sign R8-2) they should be cycleways. See osm.wiki/Bicycle_and_pedestrian_tagging_in_Australia
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97231292

Confused how you managed to get 205 deletions for a name change
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96951657

Ah, nice timing then! I saw they were missing and none of the newest imagery had them as done

Can't tell which imagery you aligned to - but DCS is generally more accuarate than any of the other sources
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96221318

Bridge looks good - should the middle also be marked as a bridge or at least layer 1? (same for the ends)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95839399

Shouldn't multiple sources be delimited with semi-colons instead of plus signs? re: changeset source
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95836677

Maxar imagery isn't very well aligned in NSW.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91159865

It should be noted that the DCS imagery was taken during the 2015 flood period, so water levels may be off.

Hi! Is Ivy Street one-way in only? Noticed it when looking at the traffic light changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95323712

Hi! Some suggestions for this:
Try not to glue paths to suburb boundaries (they're not something physical so it doesn't make sense).
You should continue the path to the right to glue to the existing path, so it becomes routable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95287044

This is not okay. You should not be modifying highways because your systems external can't handle something.

This is not okay.