Flush means that the entire guttering is also level with the road. That does not appear to be the case. See the first image example here for lowered: kerb=*

You accidentally generalised a crossing from zebra down to "marked". Zebra is more specific.
Also "flush" kerbs are level with the roadway, perhaps you wanted to tag them as "lowered"? Looks like there's a raised gutter from the imagery.
Looks good though!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94232167

Was this meant to be "Laverty Pathology"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94170181

Are the zebra crossings you deleted no longer zebras? You only have them as "marked" now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94138332

You have lots of different overlapping multipolygons here. I see you've tried over 20 times to fix it, might pay to remove the one-member relations and start fresh
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94092199

Hi! I try to avoid connecting features to administrative boundaries as one is physical and the other is more of a concept https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/398674342
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93960133

Fixed a mistake in changeset/93893921

Hi - you realigned the road to Maxar imagery, which does not match the GPS traces as well. I believe the original alignment with DCS NSW Imagery was correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93811402

Hi - you realigned the road to Maxar imagery, which does not match the GPS traces as well. I believe the original alignment with DCS NSW Imagery was correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93811402

Hi! Wondering what the source for these are? Seems like a good change, just curious.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93675015

Reverted additions in changeset/93687571. Added a fixme stating there are roadworks underway.

Hi, this piece of road is left-only out of the retail area now. It has been like this for months now, as there is current roadworks underway. Please remove what you added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93639671

Looks good - beat me to it!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93542430

Hi! I don't understand how the end result of this change is any different to its original state? The road is now 5 separate ways instead of the original 1, with no variation in tags.
Judging from aerial imagery the turning circles at the end should have been marked as oneway=yes, instead of your oneway=no
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93478065

Resolved the broken road in changeset/93284525

Hi!
Where are these names coming from? I can't tell as you didn't list a source

Also, when doing footpaths parallel to a road (see: sidewalk). It's best to use the footway=sidewalk tag along with highway=footpath in the Tags section. (section between "Fields" and "Relations")

Hi, it's recommended to re-use existing ways instead of deleting and re-creating them. (like you did for way/173254626 - osm.wiki/Keep_the_history)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92926850

Obviously wasn't paying attention when I was fixing up the node - that the shop area was also marked as the IGA.

2hu4u fixed this up a little in 92644654
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92616903