Hi there, some of the road changes on the King St / Darby St intersection are incorrectly formed. Namely the North to west turn from Darby to King street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92923460

Hi! I see you have a relatively low changeset count, so I'll try to provide some constructive feedback.

It's good practice to not delete legitimate data even if it's not complete. Given the physical word is always changing no data can be said to be complete, so having some data is better than no data.
Surrounding suburbs have sidewalk data - so now it reads as if Mayfield has none when it in fact does.
Having the basis of the data there allows it to be extended upon more easily. e.g., if I were to come along and add more sidewalks.
Similarly, you have been adding house outlines but not every house is there, so it gives the impression there are no more houses.
As for the appearance, it's not advised to "tag for the renderer" osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Not trying to be snide, but instead provide context :)

Hi, I unglued the landuse=residential from the road in changeset changeset/92857936

I have added ref and start_date back in changeset/92758811

Hi, you deleted ref=2902 and start_date off the traffic signals your adjusted. Was this intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92734869

Hi there! Do those sidewalks you deleted no longer exist? I can still see them on the most recent imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92671564

No worries, saw it was your first

Hi!
It's usually better to split up changesets if your changes are in different parts of the country and unrelated to each other

I corrected this in changeset/91138761 from a survey, BTW.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90436902

Hi, I fixed a power pole you accidentally moved in changeset #92332364

Hi, I fixed a mistake with the power pole you accidentally moved here: 92332020

Correction: source would be "survey". iD suggests the correct one. If using aerial imagery, can also name which one you used. e.g. "aerial imagery" and "NSW LPI Imagery"

Makes sense!
Sounds like you've scouted this one out in person. To help clue you in, when submitting a changeset you can (and should) include "Sources". This would only be the one source of "surveyed".

Have to be careful to only use sources we're allowed to. Anything in iD (the editor you used) is safe (e.g. the imagery, the NSW LPI Base Map, Mapillary, or OpenStreetCam). Can't use things like Google, for example.
Not that I'm saying you did, just letting you know because you're new. :)
So welcome!

Hi there!
This must be relatively new? Because I can't see it on any of the latest imagery.
Is this place no longer called Gwydir Park?

Hi, you can't use Google as a source of information due to copyright issues.

Good call, thanks

Why not mark it as a private driveway instead of deleting?

Thanks for addressing!
Nice to see someone else interested in the local area, welcome!

Also, please input a changeset comment that isn't "."

Hi RedFlyer4, a few things note:
- buildings should map the ground footprint (not the roof-line based off skewed aerial imagery)
- the name of that building isn't "school"