OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
119976163

Hello.
This library is already mapped as tags of its building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119976163

119975375

Hello.
Please STOP deleting legitimately mapped features!
Trees and address nodes are perfectly valid features to be mapped in OSM.
This edit is going to be reverted!
If you continue vandalize the map you will be reported to DWG!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119975375

119974883

Hello.
Please don't delete address nodes if they are accurate.
Address nodes are still useful when searching for specific address or other similar uses. ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119974883

119927420

Hello.
Kindly please write changeset comments describing what you are editing, not like you are trying to convince people to approve a new pokestop.
Please see this article that describes what constitutes good changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119927420

119926796

Hello.
Please note that unless a business occupies the whole building, it is inappropriate to tag it as such. Instead, such biz should be tagged as a separate poi node inside of that building's perimeter.
For a example, a stand-alone McDonald's building can be tagged as such. Or Costco that occupies the whole building. But a fruits store or bodega or restaurant that's on the ground floor of an office/apartment building should be mapped as separate node.
I've seen you did similar mistake on a number of following edits too, so please note of this. ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119926796

119921403

Ah, you merged them. It didn't look clear on osmcha. ๐Ÿ‘

119926607

Hello.
What kind of business is this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119926607

119926503

Hello.
This appears to be a multi-story residential building. As such it is inappropriate to tag the whole building with a business name if that business doesn't occupy the whole building. It must be mapped as a separate poi node within the perimeter of that building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119926503

119926444

Hello.
What kind of business is this? Where is this information is coming from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119926444

119921403

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete bike path here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119921403

119917864

Hello.
Please note that crosswalks controlled by traffic light should be tagged as such. "marked" crosswalks are intended for the ones with STOP signs. ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119917864

119912588

Hello.
There are a number of issues with this changeset that would be great for you to address in the future.
It's not necessary to create so many nodes on a perfectly straight sidewalk. This only bloats map data with no useful features. It also makes sidwalk lines don't look straight.

Crosswalks controlled by pedestrian lights should be tagged with "crossing=traffic_signals".
Crosswalks controlled by stop sign should be tagged with "crossing=marked".
When mapping sidewalks as separate paths, it's also important to tag "sidewalk=separate" on the relevant street way so that system knows that sidewalks are already mapped and not just missing, or doesn't think that sidewalks were mapped twice.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119912588

119909538

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete building number from its tag and instead incorrectly moshed it into street name?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119909538

119856217

Customers and people who left reviews where? OSM doesn't have reviews...๐Ÿคจ

119863545

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change an obviously residential road as a foot path?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119863545

119856217

Hello.
Do you mean by "local resident information"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119856217

119818729

Hello.
Does this restaurant occupy the whole building or just the ground floor and above it is a residential/office building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119818729

119804841

What does "TAD STCLM" mean?

119801173

Does this new restaurant has the same website address as the old one?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119801173

119801113

Hello.
As documented in osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions please note that it is inappropriate to use description of a feature as its name. As such this name is going to be removed. ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119801113