You can use this Overpass query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1A1e

Or use Achavi if you're specifically interested in this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140962068

@Javierpf No.

I tried this and people still complain about country-sized or state-sized bboxes, except then they have 200 changesets to complain about. I hope we can all agree that that is pointless.

This changeset is thematically very simple, so that should simplify the process of reviewing it.

P.s. At first I hadn't retagged the roof multipolygon to building=roof, and then the place looked like this: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/787052316649848832/1145855002334724196/image.png

I don't know if that's better, but you can look at the picture to compare it with the current look.

I currently made this out of it: changeset/140515453

I separated the roof multipolygon from the building footprint that uses the type=building relation. The situation is unusual, but I think this will work. Let me know what you think about it.

Hi. Please don't add relations to relations. There are other ways to map this.

I am glad we could reach an agreement.

Have a good day :)

Hi Ecoutez,

Thank you for putting this place on the map. The way you mapped it looks good overall. I do have some feedback, if you don't mind:

Based on the healthcare:speciality tag that you added, I think you can also add the tag shop=hearing_aids (shop=hearing_aids).

The description you added is subjective and has the character of marketing language, which is something we would rather not have on the map.

The opening hours should follow a machine-readable syntax so OSM-based apps can use it. Documentation for that is here: opening_hours=*

Let me know if you have any questions, and feel free to reach out to any of the contact channels of the OSM community: osm.wiki/Contact_channels

Happy mapping!

You make a valid point that the PEC is something that can be mapped explicitly. Thank you for taking your time to explain this, and I apologise about my dismissive attitude from before.

"high quality products", on the other hand, is very subjective. Businesses can promote any products they sell as "high quality".
If you look for example at these Overpass results (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zl4), you'll see a lot of claims about high quality stuff that should be taken with a grain of salt. I hope you don't mind too much that I would like to remove that type of marketing-style language from the map.

Hoi Geoff,

Ik hoop dat changeset/140284229 beter in de smaak valt.

I understand. Thank you for your efforts against the vandalism.

Hi. About the description of node/10767927101, the text "Sells electrical pipes, joints, etc." is helpful, but the parts after that are subjective and unverifiable, and information about the owner is out of scope. Would you mind removing this?

Regards,

Casper

Hi NorthCrab. You might want to have a look at way/873316158/history

Hi. What source do you have for the name of this island?

Hoi Taya,

Dankje dat je me erop attendeert. Ik heb meteen de area=yes tag toegevoegd aan alle man_made=groyne die ik bewerkt heb.

Overpass query ter referentie: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ySU

That is an issue to raise with HistOSM, especially since a lot of historic objects are already tagged with wikimedia_commons. They're missing out if they ignore the wikimedia_commons key. On top of that, image=* is intended for full web links, whereas wikimedia_commons=* is intended for either File:X or Category:X

Please refrain from “disaster tourism” mapping like this. The Ukrainian community is perfectly capable of recording destruction themselves where it is deemed useful. There’s no need for people from other parts of the world to race to be the first to translate their TV news into Ukraine mapping.

P.s. Ik heb ook 2 natuurgebieden van "park" naar "nature_reserve" veranderd.

Alright, that makes it very understandable. Thank you for clarifying.

You're right of course that I could have made proper multipolygons with the water, but since I wasn't looking for it I missed it.

Did you just comment to complain about my changeset or do you want to improve the map together?

There are thousands of cases where landuse/natural polygons overlap with water, see for example this simple query for Amsterdam: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ywp

Evidently, when you consider the whole Netherlands, the number of overlapping landuse and water polygons will become big enough that fixing them should be considered a separate project.