Friendly_Ghost's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178425132 | I also noticed you formatted height tags as 1m60. Would you mind reformatting those to height = 1.60 m ? This is the standard formatting style for height tags, see height=* for documentation. |
|
| 178425132 | Hi there. I noticed that you accidentally retagged way/178149119 to a hedge in this changeset. This broke the continuity for a large part of the watershed. I restored the river tag. |
|
| 178678346 | I deleted buildings that don't exist anymore and added nodes for new buildings. |
|
| 177674320 | We've come to an agreement on the OSM Veneto Telegram chat. See also osm.wiki/Proposal:Civil_Protection_Areas for Andrea's tagging proposal for these objects. |
|
| 177674320 | I meant the emergency=assembly_point tag, not amenity. |
|
| 177674320 | It's a descriptive name, already implied by the amenity tag. It's not the name of this place specifically, and assembly points are usually not named. |
|
| 177220709 | Hi again. As I asked previously, it would help a lot if you could write informative changeset descriptions. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for the relevant documentation. |
|
| 177180242 | P.s. Please write informative changeset descriptions. |
|
| 177180242 | There's no contention here. We use landuse=meadow for grassland that is used for livestock, hay production etc. If you want to make this explicit in OSM and specify it further, you can use the well-established meadow=* tag in addition to landuse=meadow. |
|
| 176430957 | Hi. Klopt het dat way/1461808552 een gevangenis wordt? Ik zag een bord staan met iets over de politie, maar de details waren me ontschoten. |
|
| 119921502 | Construction has still not started from what I can see, so I'd like to suggest that we remove this proposed road from OSM until construction has started and we can map it with on-the-ground sources and finalized official plans. |
|
| 171091714 | Hi. Please don't cut out waterways at bridges. There is still water under the bridges, this was already mapped correctly. Also, please write informative changeset comments. |
|
| 175749035 | Hi there. Please, please stop arbitrarily grouping landuse areas. This serves no purpose and it makes the areas impossible to work with. On top of that the slim sections around greenfields are plainly wrong. I'm also sending you this message privately in case you miss this. |
|
| 173727627 | That's not how that works. Putting stop nodes at the stop lines is an improvement in all situations, regardless of how many ways cross at an intersection. |
|
| 151919239 | Hoi Marc, Meestal zet ik deze note tag neer als een gebouw gesloopt is. Ik kan me verder deze specifieke situatie niet herinneren. Mvg,
|
|
| 153126170 | Interessante situatie. Ik zit momenteel niet achter m'n pc, dus voel je vrij om mijn wijziging van deze laadpaal ongedaan te maken. |
|
| 171970773 | In that case GSE is just the name of the company and not specifically of the site, so operator=GSE (or GSE Italia) would be a more suitable tag. |
|
| 171970773 | Thank you for adding the missing building. What does GSE mean? |
|
| 170516027 | I gave up on that concept. Anyway, we have good review tools like better-osm-org, OSMcha and OSM changeset visualiser, so this shouldn't be much of a problem. I also discussed this already with the broader community on the forum and people seemed to approve of it, so if you have something to add to that discussion, please do. |
|
| 170122879 | My edit has already been reverted without my prior knowledge. |