OpenStreetMap
Friendly_Ghost's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170631278 | Hi. Why did you revert my edit without even mentioning it to me? |
|
| 170122879 | So the information is not redundant. I never said that. I said that explicit tags are redundant, because the information is already in the data. |
|
| 170122879 | You can take the length from the length of the OSM way. If this doesn't match with the signed length, then either the sign or the OSM data is incorrect. |
|
| 170122879 | The length of a road section is indicated by the length of the way. There is no indication in the data or in the documentation that this has anything to do with signage. |
|
| 170282495 | Thank you, Spaghetti Monster <3 |
|
| 170123663 | Reverted my own edit after discussion on Telegram OSM Italia. |
|
| 170123663 | Hi Andrea. Casper here. As I mentioned in my changeset comment, they are redundant and should not be added to every road. I have tried to contact you about this before, but you haven't replied. |
|
| 170124713 | Hi. Again, could you stop adding redundant tags to roads, please? |
|
| 168668887 | Looks much better now. Thank you for the edit. |
|
| 166541055 | This changeset had some conflicts, so I hope I haven't broken any relations. Let me know if you find anything that I broke and I'll happily repair it. |
|
| 166267215 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166180613 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166226226 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166267380 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166216693 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166211898 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166267789 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166268142 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166268678 | Reverted spam |
|
| 166225964 | Reverted spam |