You may send any photos pertaining to this case to data@osmfoundation.org quoting Ticket#2026022110000069 in the subject.

Dear Lesnydzban, perhaps you could have a look at changeset/178792317 where one of the businesses added in this changeset is being discussed.

Mapping a business on OSM does not require knowing a registration number. If there is a sign on the door saying "you can get a haircut here" then we map that as a hairdresser, no matter if they have properly registered their company or not. Rafał Plewa, please provide photographic evidence of the existence of a sex shop in this location, otherwise we'll continue to believe that the original information added by user Lesnydzban in 2021 is correct, and if you continue to vandalize this information we will block your account.

The trail was already tagged with "access=no" meaning it was illegal to use. There is not reason for deleting it. Chappy-2, in the future if you encounter trails on OSM that exist in reality but are illegal to use, please add an access=private or access=no instead of deleting (which was already present in this case). See osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Discussion happened in changeset/51058292 - thank you for reaching out to the original mapper. To avoid questions it is best to place a link to the discussion in the future.

Hallo rogtay, ein anonymer Hinweisgeber behauptet, dass es sich bei way/474192785 und seiner Verlängerung nicht um einen Privatweg handele. Woher hattest Du seinerzeit die Info?

Hallo rogtay, ein anonymer Hinweisgeber behauptet, dass es sich bei way/38207442 *nicht* um einen Privatweg handelt, wie von Dir eingetragen. Kannst Du Dich noch daran erinnern, wass Dich zu der Eintragung veranlasst hat?

Hallo rogtay, ein anonymer Hinweisgeber behauptet, dass es sich bei way/26162025 (und dessen Fortsetzung) *nicht* um einen Privatweg handelt, wie von Dir eingetragen. Kannst Du Dich noch erinnern, woher Du seinerzeit die Information hattest?

Dear KvardeX OSM, please have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and use better changeset comments. Thank you!

Sure go ahead... it is possible that the automatic revert skipped bits that were touched by other in the meantime, or otherwise were connected to stuff that we want to keep.

The contributor has been asked to discuss with the local community (see block message). If the outcome of that discussion is that the deletions are legit, they can easily be replayed. Discuss first, delete later. Not the other way round.

Please explain why you deleted all buildings inside the "Carcel de Pedregal"?

Hallo Alex0708, bitte melde dich doch in dieser Diskussion zu Wort https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-von-staging-areas-auf-dem-gelande-des-frankfurter-flughafens/141552 und erkläre Sinn und Charakter dieser Daten, damit die Community entscheiden kann, ob sie sie behalten will. Interessant wären für uns vorallem die Fragen (a) kann man so eine Staging-Area vor Ort sehen und (b) kann man die Daten der FRAPORT also korrigieren und verbessern, indem man vor Ort die Augen aufsperrt?

Dear Fedorova19, when uploading edits to OSM, please provide a human-readable description of your edits in the "changeset comment". You have used the text "we" for describing all your edits, which does not say anything meaningful. See osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Dear Devanshi_Malik, if you need to make experiments, make them on one of the dev servers and not on OpenStreetMap proper. If you want to import data to OpenStreetMap proper, prior discussion is required (see osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines). I doubt that the highly detailed "microwatershets" in this import would pass muster with the OSM community; at the very least, the "area_in_ha" tag, the source on each object, the "ref", and the high precision would need to go.

Dear DKFactotum, it appears that you are adding trees in various locations in the context of certain projects. Please have a look at our "organised editing guidelines" https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines and follow the documentation and discussion requirements outlined there.

looks like user deleting their own contribution

Michael, I can see that the buildings you have removed are not visible on Bing imagery any more so I assume the deletions are legit. However, when you come across whole clusters of buildings that you believe to be wrong, take a moment to study how they have been added to OSM - in this case, two years ago in a project identifying itself as "#hotosm-project-15495" - and maybe contact those who added the buildings. Who knows, perhaps they had better information than the current Bing imagery lets you see?

Also, when deleting whole clusters of buildings, don't use a changeset comment that says "mapped buildings" - clearly say that you deleted lots of buildings on purpose because you could not identify them on the imagery. That helps us other mappers understand that you knew what you were doing, rather than accidentally deleting buildings!

Dear user Biker69, in this changeset you have deleted a large number of tracks without giving any explanation - just "modified geofeatures and / or roads" which is a totally useless changeset comment. Please explain why you deleted these tracks. In the future, please use changeset comments that describe the particular edit, not generic words that match every edit.

Dear Pan, a while ago you were involved in a dispute with other community members about the detail of your mapping (especially the detail of forests if I remember correctly). You have not really relented much since then; in this changeset you have added two traffic islands of maybe 10m² each, and meticulously traced their outline with over 10 nodes each. Many micro forests in the vicinity have an unnatural node density (suggesting a precision that the forest will outgrow within a year). You are painting the map with micro grass strips and micro forests that look straight like blobs from the "potrace" software ( relation/19907734). Please reconsider your modus operandi or there will come a time when we have to write a program that takes every single landuse you ever touched and reduces their number of points by 75%.