Hi, can it be said that it's both a park and a disc golf course? Then we'd need to restore the park feature.

* Please don't put addresses into name

Reverted

1) Please don't addresses into name
2) Both of those buildings have correct address, contact Facebook if you think they handle multiple addresses incorrectly.

Please refer to the wiki

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

osm.wiki/Addresses

osm.wiki/Names

Hi, main road to a house cannot be a track.

You probably wanted to use a surface tag:
surface=*

highway=track
"The tag highway=track is used for minor land-access roads"

Please restore the road type.

Hi and welcome,
Please add more meaningful descriptions to your changesets. Anything is better than "test".

For example, just "Landuse" would already be more helpful.

"Test" makes your changesets look more suspicious as one can assume that you are testing something and adding fake data.

I've tried my best to improve it. Neighboring streets' access was also updated.

I'll also check opposite direction of Laikmaa later, not clear if private vehicles are forbidden there, right turn from Narva mnt doesn't seem to be forbidden.

I've surveyed the tap. It doesn't seem to work at the moment. Still, it exists and should be tagged a disused: lifecycle prefix and maybe disused=yes tag. Maybe it only works in the summer.

@Mart Raudsepp
check the conditional tag

maxspeed=70
maxspeed:conditional=50 @ (07:00-19:00)

I don't see why it was changed though, maybe there was missing speed limit added in some other place and this was made consistent with it.

But I'd prefer if we'd use the one which is both lower and during which more cars pass as the main one for simple data consumers.

Hi, could you explain why was this POI removed?

How is this a fix?

My opinion is that everything which can have an address, can have it in OSM. And those barns have an address. It would be incorrect to remove the correct data.

Search isn't the only way to use OSM data.

We could add a new tag for the main building.

Also, remember that cafes, shops can be mapped separately from the building and can have an address too, which will duplicate the address of the building.

Hello, it may be not productive to change coastline back and forth depending on when aerial imagery was taken. Wiki suggests using high tide.

natural=coastline

Maybe it's better to use streams instead of drains? Those are natural, as I understand.

waterway=stream

waterway=drain

Hi, as you've specified, it's an office, not a shop where customers actually walk in and see products.

I've removed the shop tag and tagged it as an office.

Not sure why you're changing one incorrect address to a more incorrect one

https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=CU03702219

fixed.

building=retail only says what kind of building it is, what's it's built for or architectural type. It's actual use may differ.

For shops, add shop=* tag with appropriate value

shop=*

Adding it to bus stops isn't very useful though. Also, often bus stop can serve buses from different networks, for example lines between cities alongside inner city buses.

There is also a footway visible to the North of the parking lot. I'd recommend adding it and connecting it to the road which should go through the parking lot.

The building shouldn't be marked as amenity=kindergarten at all, since the kindergarten is already mapped as an area. When possible, mapping the territory is preferred.

The parking lot type surface would be more correct than lane.

highway=living_street

should be leading up to it, not a footway

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=59.36833990000201&lng=28.180284300001063&z=16.56332163164303&pKey=364184809137342&focus=photo&x=0.505208496105508&y=0.4983206522680055&zoom=0

It also should go right through the middle of the parking lot to allow routing.

Hi,
The network tag is not about bus numbers. It's about the general network they operate under. It would be something like "Narva public transport" I guess.