qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 156790706 | Fix: Previously, wiki stated that oneway=yes should only be taken into account for vehicles, and that foot traffic should use foot:forward and foot:backward keys. foot:forward=* (oneway:foot is also mentioned though) |
|
| 156790706 | Previously, wiki stated that oneway=yes should only be taken into account for vehicles, and that foot traffic should use oneway:foot key. Old wiki link, see "Pedestrians"
Currently there is a link to this poll
|
|
| 169425316 | Hi, living street should be marked by a corresponding traffic sign. By your description I'm not sure if the decision was made based on this information. |
|
| 170299862 | Hi, building should encompass all of its parts. |
|
| 166099098 | The node at correct address already exists. Node with Riisipere as an address has no place in Tallinn. Please delete it. |
|
| 165787759 | Hi, please make sure that names like "Suur "S"" are actually known and used (not in a small closed group of people) |
|
| 165927836 | Hi,
|
|
| 165286760 | Sorry, wrong link https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894 |
|
| 165286760 | Hi,
2) Also, please don't just favor bicycles instead of foot traffic. These crossings are for people too, access tags already allow bicycles to use them. I guess
More information
|
|
| 164801355 | It's just 6 in Maa- ja Ruumiamet. |
|
| 164810765 | Hi,
highway=path or highway=cycleway are correct https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894 |
|
| 164593716 | Also, please don't add feature description/type as a name, leave it blank. |
|
| 164593716 | Hi and welcome!
|
|
| 164214911 | IMO you can connect the forests to the farmlands, I don't see the point in those gaps |