peregrination's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162067339 | Good tip, thank you |
|
| 162067339 | Just moved to "name" |
|
| 118964253 | Totally agree with you 👍 |
|
| 108636158 | finally the benches 👍 |
|
| 107914526 | Thank you! |
|
| 105701403 | Looks like I screwed up my changeset title |
|
| 47998101 | yes that's a good idea, go for it :) |
|
| 47998101 | also I've changed the shape of the park just now as it was mapped across a part which is private land. I'm not sure what's the best leisure/landuse tag to use for this "Park", you probably got a better suggestion than leisure=park ? |
|
| 47998101 | I've not been back in 3-4 years, but I believe that it's a public space made of 75% concrete, 25% grass,
you can see the name being used here for example : https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6405346 The name "Armada Green Park" may have been deprecated since, I'm not sure. |
|
| 94447424 | I was wrong.
|
|
| 94447424 | hi - is this area really industrial ?
|
|
| 89866069 | regarding imagery, the new outline I draw is correct, I live close by |
|
| 89866069 | fixed via changeset/90018863 |
|
| 89866069 | you're making a good point, I wasn't sure how to fix the pre-existing problem, some shops under residential buildings were recorded like the whole building is a shop.
|
|
| 88574426 | Should the VeloPark and the BMX track also be removed from the park itself, aka reducing the park area? |
|
| 89701028 | Thanks for the extra note tags. I've noticed that the new Kidbrooke + Fulham Riverside developments are using the same kind of covered parkings. |
|
| 85448240 | sorry I don't have any updates related to that area, I've just tweaked the shape of the land from what I remember... I don't think it should be set as "construction" but "brownfield" instead ? |
|
| 47909592 | Indeed they're not part of the park anymore |
|
| 79170113 | LGTM |
|
| 60831702 | Thanks I checked and it seems that it's all good now. Sorry again for my deletion, even after 3000+ edits I managed to screw up. |