Hi skyper,
In principle, all routes of a route master should be changed if they are faulty.
Since some route masters contain many routes, it is not always possible to change all routes at once. This can happen simply because of time constraints.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
please check my profile to see the QA tools. I use separate CS so that any wrong edit can be undone individually.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
ok, no new tag. I have reverted my change. What question can I answer for you?

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
my intention is to tag AST uniformly like in relation/5334840
Do you have any concerns?

Regards
😎

Because the route has many gaps. When it is complete again, it will be set to PTv2.

Is it better now?

I removed the tag train=yes from the stops between Römerkastell and Walpershofen/Etzenhofen.

Please explain me exactly what you mean.

A stop position was not on the affected route. This was reported by OSM inspector.