Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
ok, no new tag. I have reverted my change. What question can I answer for you?

Regards
😎

Hi skyper,
my intention is to tag AST uniformly like in relation/5334840
Do you have any concerns?

Regards
😎

Because the route has many gaps. When it is complete again, it will be set to PTv2.

Is it better now?

I removed the tag train=yes from the stops between Römerkastell and Walpershofen/Etzenhofen.

Please explain me exactly what you mean.

A stop position was not on the affected route. This was reported by OSM inspector.

The gap in the affected routes was reported by OSM inspector.

Stop area renamed

I have created a ticket. Thank you for your support.

I looked in the OSM inspector at which point the relation is incorrect. Then I load this position via the button 'tell JOSM editor to zoom ...' from the selection area into JOSM, open the relation editor and correct the order of the ways.

I use the plugins public_transport and reltoolbox. I usually use the relation editor.

The tool is JOSM. What can I do? Use a newer version?

The tool is JOSM. What can I do? Use a newer version?

Hi, the OSM inspector had reported an invalid route at this 'roundabout'. Sorry!

Repairing a route means the order of the ways and the stops.
Repairing does not mean the route guidance and the topicality of the route.

Repairing does not mean the route guidance and the topicality of the route.

Corrected in changeset #114066045

Repairing does not mean the route guidance and the topicality of the route.

You are demolishing consistently relation #163262. Please follow the rules of PTv2.