OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
53884450

Hi,
there are still more than 9000 objects edited by you with the tag "tracks=yes".
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tQC

54657037

Hi,
you used the tag "addr:sreet" on many objects. The correct spelling would be "addr:street". Could you have a look and fix these?
Cheers, Jan

54667289

Hi,
you used the tag "add:village" on many roads, unfortunately there are two issues:
1. it should be "addr:city"
2. this tag is only used for addresses of buildings, not on roads. If necessary you could add "is_in:city" on roads, but this is not needed if the city itself is mapped.
Could you have a look and fix this?

Jan

54674111

Hi,
it looks like you imported a lot of data for hotels here. Unfortunately, some of the tagging is wrong:
E.g. here: node/2428498001

- add:postcode should be addr:postcode
- there is no "award" tag, the proposal has been rejected
- 'stars' should only contain a number, no text
- there is no 'opening_day' tag, it should be 'opening_hours' and follow the well-defined syntax rules
- 'contact:url' should be 'website'
- there is no tag 'city', it should be 'addr:city'
- the phone and fax numbers don't follow the international phone number scheme

- you added source tags to some nodes of buildings: node/4266700917
- the description tags look like pure advertisements, like way/427461423

Please have a look and fix these issues.
Jan

54517120

Hallo,
bei 24 dieser Wege soll es wohl "railway:track_ref" und nicht "railway:trak_ref" heissen. Schaust du da mal drüber?
Gruss, Jan

54596868

Hi,
could you point us to the documentation of this import?
Jan

54476273

Hi,
the tag "maxspeed:permanent" you used here is new and undocumented. Could you explain its meaning?

Thanks, Jan

54569146

Hi,
could you please check the tagging of some nodes? There are 52 nodes with the tag "Natural=trees" which should be "natural=tree".

Jan

54575664

Hi,
I guess something went wrong here, all these roads have many imported tags that don't look like they belong to the OSM database. Could you check and fix that?

Cheers, Jan

54552398

and:
addr:house -> addr:housenumber

Some do have "addr:house = 0", which doesn't seem to be a valid housenumber.

54552398

Hi,
these nodes contain tags with spelling mistakes:
addr:neigh -> addr:neighbourhood
addr:postc -> addr:postcode
Could you please have a look and fix these 319 POIs?

Thanks, Jan

54473897

Hallo,
du hast hier Tags benutzt wie "Mo. - Fr. = ..." oder "tel.:". Bitte benutze nur Keys wie sie im Wiki beschrieben sind, also "opening_hours" und "phone", sonst kann keine Software etwas mit den Informationen anfangen.

Gruß, Jan

54351698

The tags I mentioned are new to OSM, not used before. And they are not mentioned on your Wiki page as well.

54466710

Hi,
could you check this relation? I can't make sense of the tag "nx = l"

54351698

Hi,
these edits introduced several strange tags on 14 objects:
GENERIC TP
OBJECTID 3276
SHAPESTAre 9.218000289160156E7
SHAPESTLen 84464.43847961596
Zoning TP

Could you check & fix this?
Thanks, Jan

54470921

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
in your edits I found some nodes with tags like "Meccanico = Meccanico Marella". This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!
Cheers, Jan
Jan

54457619

Hi,
I found some spelling mistakes in these edits - instead of the correct "species" you wrote "specices" and "speices". Could you please check and correct these?

Cheers, Jan

54471472

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure that all the tags you use are spelled correctly - otherwise they can not be used by any software. E.g.
"fr: naf" should be "ref:FR:NAF"
"fr: siret" should be "ref:FR:SIRET"
In these cases you used many different spellings which should be fixed.

Second, for opening_hours there is a well defined syntax which has to be used:
opening_hours=*

Cheers, Jan

54432608

Hi,
in your edits you invented several new tags like these:
no: of rooms
staff: Name
For both of them, you used many (at least 11) different spellings. Please only use tags that are described in the wiki, everything else can not be understood by any software and is therefore rather useless.

54393759

Hallo,
du hast hier den Key "roof:ridges" benutzt - richtig wäre "roof:ridge". Kannst du das noch korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan