Hi,
you added the key "kaart" to all these ways - this is new and undocumented. Could you explain its meaning?

Thanks, Jan

Hi,
could you please check the spelling of keys? I saw several spelling mistakes there, e.g. in "building:part",
For example way/544925864

Cheers, Jan

Kannst du hier und beim nächsten Gebäude die housenumber-Tags prüfen? Da stimmt etwas nicht.
way/309245360
Gruß, Jan

The same holds for 2700 buildings with the tag "builing:levels" which should be "building:levels".
And there are buildings mapped twice, e,g, around 7th Commercial Street.

Ist das hier wirklich ein Park oder eine Fläche mit Bäumen? Siehe note/1228213

Hi Phil,
I didn't add them, this was brianboru in changeset/54115710
I just corrected the spelling from an '_' to a ':', assuming it was just a spelling mistake and the content was correct.

Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found some nodes like this one: node/5256902958
There is only one tag describing the object, but no known tag as they are documented in the Wiki. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.

Please have a look and refine the tagging.
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you check this way?
way/543957467
The tagging doesn't look right.

Cheers, Jan

Please fix your workflow to include spell checking of tags. I'm fixing wrong spellings of 'implicit' almost every day.

Hi,
you've added 777 buildings with a misspelled tag: "builing:levels" instead of "building:levels". Could you have a look and fix these?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM! I found several nodes with tags like this one:
node/5255840747

This might be a description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan

I think these points should be deleted - they are imported from some unknown source, unknown license. The tagging is not properly done and simple retagging to e.g. place=village does not really help data quality.

Jan

Hi,
I don't know precisely what happened here, but there are various keys with a trailing space, like "foot " instead of "foot". I fixed some of them - please check if I catched all of them.

Jan

Thanks! Good to know that there is some documentation and planning behind.

Some ideas about keys:
usefulaaltomap:uid -> short_name
usefulaaltomap:id -> ref:university, ref:aalto
usefuaaltomap:show -> this is a bit problematic because it just tells one specific renderer what to do - as there are hundreds of renderers and applications it would be quite a mess if all put their specific rendering rules to the database
access=university - be careful here, 'access' tags are interpreted by almost every tool and do have quite some influence on usability (e.g. routing), so you should use standard values here.

I'd suggest to put a link to your documentation to you changeset comments to make sure people like me can find it.
You could also make a post on the forums or mailing list about your project to see what other people can contribute.

I found many tags like these in your edits:
change:forward_1
turn:lanes:backward_1
turn:lanes:forward_1
turn:lanes:both_ways_1

Please watch out for correct tags, especially correct use of :forward and :backward!

Hi,
you invented some new tags here,
usefulaaltomap:id, usefulaaltomap:show

These are not used in other places and are not documented. Could you explain there meaning? To me it looks a bit like a ref number, and a ref:XXX tag would be a good choice.

Jan

Hi,
you added several nodes which do not have any common tag on them, like this one.
Most of the data actually looks like random key presses ('12345','qwerty', etc.)
Please do not add such tags to the OSM database. Use only tags as they are described in the Wiki and that have actual relevance.

Jan

Hi,
you added the key "distrito" to these buildings - this key is new und undocumented. Is this number part of the address? Then it should have a key like "addr:...".

Jan

Hi,
please don't forget the '_' in keys:
zone:De_Lijn
ref:De_Lijn

You don't need tags like COM1, COM2 and so on - this can all be covered by the existing and established 'building' tag.
If you actually want to introduce a new tag, you should write a description for the Wiki and ask the community for comments.