Hi,
could you please have a look at these changes? You added some "highway=residential" to objects which should rather be buildings.

Jan

Hi,
you're adding the tag "building:condion" to many buildings - please note that the correct spelling is "building:condition". Could you have a look at these and fix it? Let us know if you need help!

Jan

Hi,
I found some objects with strange tags, could you explain the meaning of this?
way/536945120
Consejo Comunal Urbakasitk 22 =C.C. URBCASITK22

This might be a description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common tags.

Jan

Hi,
this import of data looks rather strange, there seem to be a lot of errors.
- For example, the geometry has rooms with walls not matching the building walls, sticking out of the actual building.
- There are many tags used that are not defined, like "building:part:vertical passage:floor range", "building:part=room","https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:door=yes/manual" and many more.
- All the name tags of the objects don't seem to be actual names but descriptions.

It seems you are working for some kind of company, please specify this in your profile.
The source of the changeset "Auto CAD OSM" doesn't seem to be a source but rather a tool you used - what is the actual source of the data and does its license match the requirements of OSM?

Jan

Hi,
this edit (and some more changesets) contains quite a number of mistakes:
- Several of the building polygons have an invalid geometry, they must not intersect with themselves.
- In aerial images I can't see some of the structures, and some existing features that were already mapped you have deleted.
- On several hundred nodes you added the tags building=commercial, name=Unicentro which shouldn't be there
- the height tags seem unrealistic - 2.5 meters is smaller than any mall I have ever seen, you would have to crawl inside the building.
- many buildings have the tag "Uso=Residencial" which is not used in any other place.

Would you please have a look to these issues and correct them?

Jan

Hi,
you uploaded almost 500 nodes with just the tag "taskStatus=VALIDATEDV2" - I guess this was a mistake and can be deleted?

Jan

'd:t:l' what's the meaningof that? - your tagging scheme gets more and more complicated.

Hi,
you added the tag 'mb:scale' to 18 ways - could you correct the spelling? 'mtb:scale'

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
it looks llike you added the tag 'add:state' to all these 3000 nodes. Correct spelling would be 'addr:state'. Could you fix this?
Actually, this tag is not needed, the state can be determined from boundary relations which exist for all states.
jan

I deleted these nodes - most of them do not correspond to any structure on the ground, and they do not have any common OSM tag.

Du hast hier in die Flughafenschleife einen ziemlichen Knick eingebaut & die neue Lage der Gleise deckt sich auch nicht mit Luftbildern vor dem Tunnel:
node/5200894041

Hi,
dann sollte das wohl als ref an die Stromleitung selbst: way/352093529

Hallo, was meinst du denn mit dem Tag "System=306" an diesen 36 Strommasten? So etwas gibt es in der OSM-Datenbank bis jetzt nicht.
Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you added several ways with many foreign tags - this looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix this?
For example: way/536405582
Cheers, Jan

Hallo,
willkommen beim "aktiven" mappen. :-)

Hast du zufällig noch ein paar mehr Informationen zu dieser Ladestation?
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
z.B. "kostenlos" wäre fee=no

Hi,
you added the tag "road_closed" to one way - this tag is not used in other places, could you explain it?
Thanks, Jan

Hi,
could you check this node? The tagging seems wrong:
node/5181712102

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
why did you change so many tags on this node to lower case? The upper case version is used in OSM hundreds of times, the lower case is new.
node/1917823504

Cheers, Jan

Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - just corrected 2 different misspellings (and several more yesterday) of 'implicit' on several ways.

Hi,
thanks for the reply. You say that you got some data from "chittagong city corporation". Did you check the license this data is subject to? All data has to fit to the ODbL of OSM, otherwise it can not be added.
Second, if you add data from an external source, you have to be aware of the OSM Import Guidelines as described here: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Third, all these tags from your import should not appear in OSM, as they are no documented tags:
acc 0
areaskm 1.731162
bbscode 20154117
distcode 15
district Chittagong
divcode 2
division Chittagong
fcode FA001
geocode 2154117.0
nm3 UNK
nm4 UNK
objectid 1114
select_ 0
shape_area 1.52E-4
shape_leng 0.068216
subtypes 0
ttt 21541
unioncode 17
unionname Ward - 17
upazila CCC (Bakalia)
usg 0
uzcode 41

Please remove them, or replace them by appropriate tags.