Hi,
you uploaded twice the same dataset, containing points like this one: node/5221310477
They do not have any valid tag. I'm going to delete them, please upload this again _after_ you have fixed the tagging.

Jan

The name of the tag looks rather specific to the Netherlands. It might be a good idea to start a proposal for a generic tag for this type of vehicle. German law makes a similar distinction between electric bicycles and e-bikes.

Thanks for taking care of this spelling mistake.

As you say, 'contact:website' is correct, but used about 10 times less than 'website' which makes me prefer the latter.

Enjoy mapping!
Jan

Hi,
habe in deinen Edits in den letzten Tagen einige falsche Tags gefunden und korrigiert, wie dieses hier:
"abandoned:railway=water" = "yes"
Im Key darf kein osm.wiki/Tag:'=' auftauchen und es muss "abandoned:railway" = "water_tower" heißen.

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you invented a new tag here - "speed_pedalic". Could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found the tag "địa chỉ" on several of your nodes. Tags should always be in English. Please have a look at the description in the wiki: osm.wiki/Vi:Key:addr
Could you change these tags accordingly?

Cheers, Jan

Hallo,
ich sehe, dass du die im größeren Stil ref-Nummern von Denkmälern erfasst mit Tags wie ref:blankenheim_(ahr)=163
Ich denke es wäre besser hier ein gemeinsames Tag zu benutzen, anstelle eines neuen Keys für jeden Ort. Wäre ein "ref:UD" nicht ausreichend? Dass diese Nummern anscheinend nur je Stadt eindeutig sind schadet ja ersteinmal nicht, da die Stadt ja jeweils bekannt ist (durch addr:city oder Grenzrelationen). Umlaute und Klammern in Keys sind zwar technisch möglich, sollte man aber doch lieber vermeiden.

Nebenbei, "eigene Beobachtung" ist glaube ich nicht so ganz die richtige Quellenangabe.

Gruß, Jan

Hallo,
du hast hier einige Wegweiser eingetragen und Tags wie "direction:north" verwendet. Die übliche Schreibweise ist "direction_north" mit einem Unterstrich.

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you added several contact tags in your recent changesets. Unfortunately there is a spelling mistake:
"contact: email" - there should not be a space in the key. The same holds for 'contact:phone' and 'contact:website' (which more often is just 'website'. Could you have a look and fix these mistakes?

Jan

Hi,
the key 'colour_name' is new and not used in other places so far. There is actually no need for it, you can put the colour name directly in the 'colour' tag, it accepts all CSS colour names (in lower case and without dashes).

Cheers, Jan

Please don't import data from an unknown source. All these objects have only tags that should not appear in OSM, such as "layer =_WALKS_FOR_OSM". Please have a look at the Wiki how to tag e.g. highways and read the import guidelines. If you use an external source, you must state it in the changeset.

Hi,
you invented many new tags in this changeset, like these:
buildingpart=vertical passage
buildingpart:vertical passage=elevator
buildingpart:vertical passage:floor range=0 to 29

Please have a look to the wiki how indoor mapping is actually done:
osm.wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging

Also, the 'name' tag should only contain the actual name of an object, not generic descriptions like "vertical elevator connector"

Hi,
in this changeset, you invented many new keys like
blockage=concrete
drain_type=culvert
multiple_channels=no
profile_closed=round

These are not documented in the wiki and hence can not be understood by other mappers or any software. Please check if you can find another, more appropriate tagging of these.

Jan

Hi,
all these objects have many foreign tags, which seem to be imported from an external database and should not appear in OSM, like this one: way/538840834

This data can not be found on the source you stated - what is the actual source of this data and does it comply with OSM's ODbL?

Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I saw that you put the tag "địa chỉ" on these nodes. Please note that all tags in OSM have to be in English and are described in the wiki - in your case the correct tag would be "addr:full". Would you mind correcting these?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have two remarks:
Please don't put the nodes of the shops on the road - place a node at the side of the road, where the shop actually is.

Second, you used the tag "SĐT" on some shops. This tag is not used by anyone else up to now. If this is a registration number of the shop, you can consider using "ref:sdr" instead.

Cheers, Jan

Alright, I've reverted it:
changeset/53533035

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this object?

The tag you added might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan

Hi,
could you describe what this objects are? You invented quite many new tags here and I can't find a description of them on the wiki.

Jan

Jan

Hi,
could you describe what this node is exactly?
node/5203310121
It has many tags describing what it is, but unfortunately this doesn't help in OSM. No software (and other mappers as well) can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan