Hi,
you added the key 'isin' on 126 buildings. Is that "is_in:city"? But there is also an "addr:city" which is different. Could you have a look?

Jan

The geometries look fine, but I think that this tag shouldn't be there.

Hi,
please don't add 5 landuse and 7 leisure tags to the same object - this is not how OSM works. If you want to add e.g. a baseball court, you have to add an additional object for this and use the tags that are defined in the wiki.

Jan

Hi,
could you check this way?
The tag "ref:fr:" looks like a mistake.
way/605638611

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I found the key "indoormark:" 123 times in these edits - note the ':' in the key. I guess you wanted to use "indoormark" without the ':'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added tags like "osmid=535911046" on many buildings. This looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Thanks, Jan

Hi,
you added tags like "osmid=535911046" on many buildings. This looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Thanks, Jan

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "tract_geoid=48201311700" you added on 850 buildings? This looks like a mistake to me.

Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM. In your edits I saw many tags that are not common. Please have a look to the Wiki and learn about which tags can be used to describe objects. Only then the information is usable by any kind of software. Also, please take care about the spelling - this is very important. I found 10 different spellings of "estado agrietado" and several more for "tiempo". Also, both these tags, along with "materiales" and several others are not known in OSM.

Jan

Hi,
I noticed a spelling mistake on these objects: The key is "building", not "biuilding".

Please have a look and fix these 648 objects.

Cheers, Jan

Hallo,
hast du eine Genehmigung die Daten dieser Seite für OSM zu verwenden? Ich kann keinen Hinweis auf Nutzungsbedingungen finden.

Kurzzeitige Sperrungen (hier nicht mal 2 Monate) sollten auch nicht durch Änderungen der access-Tags eingetragen werden, sondern z.B. mit osm.wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)
Anderenfalls funktionieren Router, die ihre Daten nur selten aktualisieren (Navi!) auf lange Zeit nicht richtig.

Jan

Hi,
I found several wrong tags regarding lanes here and on other streets.
E.g. way/417198049

- If there is only one lane in forward direction, turn:lanes:forward = left| can't be right, because this implies two lanes (unless there is something like a bicycle lane)
If there is a center turn lane, the tag is turn:lanes:both_ways = left

- it's ":lanes", not ":lane"
- change|lane|forward -> change:lanes:forward

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you used tags like these (here and on other roads)
carriageway width, carriagewaycamber, carriagewaywidth, These are no common tags - could you explain what they mean? Maybe we can find a common way to tag those features.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you used the tag "lanes:center" on few roads. This tag is not used in other places.
If there is a center turn lane, this is commonly tagged as
lanes:both_ways = 1
turn:lanes:both_ways = left

Cheers, Jan

I removed those tags and fixed the spelling of e.g. "source". changeset/60507474

Sure: use overpass-turbo to create a query for these tags, then load this in JOSM and edit the tags.

Here's the query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/A72
Then just click on 'Export' -> 'JOSM'.

It's difficult to warn about spelling mistakes as there is no constraint on which keys you might use. I'm using a list of new keys that weren't used before based on Taginfo:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm

Hi,
you added keys like "osmid=535929240" on many objects. Could you check this? This tag looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added the tag "buiulding:part" on 74 ways, could you fix the spelling of "building"?

Thanks, Jan

Hi,
I found 10 buildings with tags like "77 = 61", e.g. way/294213731

Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan