Hi,
these 'accepts' tags are new. I guess one of them can be changed to 'capacity' and one more to 'count'. For deposit return machines we do have a vending_machine tag:
vending=bottle_return

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tags like "Cal Tacanet = Graves i excavacions Castellot SA" you added? These are not common, maybe we can find a documented tag to describe these features?

Jan

This scheme is undocumented and introduces a huge amount of new keys with impact on all data users. Please make a proposal for this new scheme and get the opinions of other mappers.

Hi,
could you explain those "2017:" tags on this area?
way/214787644/history

It's not common to put a year in front of any tag. If the parking is gone, the tags can be deleted. If it's important information, the "was:" prefix could be used.

Hi,
all these strange tags on this school look like a mistake:

HN_MAX = 12.21
HN_P99 = 11.13
H_DSM_MAX = 34.57
H_DSM_P99 = 33.49
H_DTM_GEM = 22.36
H_DTM_MIN = 22.11
auto_building = school
detection_method = from existing OSM building source: school ,hits (1)
size_grb_building = 9210.28
size_shared = 3005.75
size_source_building = 3120.18

way/368298797

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you uploaded several boundaries with just foreign tags - could you have a look and fix these tags?
E.g. way/609649838

Thanks, Jan

Hi,
could you check your "zone:De Lijn" keys (and similar ones)? The correct spellin is "De_Lijn" with an underscore instead of the space.
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki to see how sports pitches have to be tagged. For example, you used:
Sport =Soccer

The correct tagging would be: leisure=pitch sport=soccer

sport=*

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you have a look to these address tags? I doubt that the village / zones are really called "Other" here.

addr:settlement=Other
addr:zone=Other
addr_settlement_other=Palorinya
addr_zone_other=Zone 1

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
in this import you used several unusual tags which should be replaced by documented tags. For example:

addr:settlement -> addr:village
chambers -> toilets:num_chambers
source_version -> source
gender_use -> female, male, unisex

Would you mind changing these tags to make this data accessible for other users?
Thanks, Jan

Hi,
you added the tag "left only" on this way - what is the meaning of this?
way/15422269

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
In addition, the spelling of tags has to be right - the slightest spelling mistake makes the data unusable.

Tags like "tiempo" and "estado agrietado" are not defined and can't be understood by any software. Please have a look to the Wiki to find out about common tags.

Cheers, Jan

Please don't use the OSM database for testing - this data is used by many people world-wide and is not the right place to make any experiments. Please use the development database for this:
osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

Hi,
'razed' wird als Prefix verwendet, nicht als Suffix.
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Technisch gesehen wäre "razed:watermill" also korrekt. Da dieses Tag aber höchstwahrscheinlich so exotisch ist, dass es kaum einer auswertet habe ich mich für das generische "razed" entschieden.

Hi,
in the revert you re-added several tags with spelling mistakes:
state:rout,state:route,state_route
Should we change them to one common spelling? What is the meaning of these?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added 2 "building:levels:undergorund" tags here - could you check which one is right?
way/61589560

Jan

Hi,
the tag "bridge=truss", "osm.wiki/Tag:truss=..." are not common. There is another approach for tagging these traffic signs already in use (2000 times):
man_made = gantry
gantry:type = ...

There is no proper documentation available, but at least it is in use.

osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Gantry

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gantry%3Atype#values

Hi,
you added several objects with just one tag:
"CDRT=yes". Could you explain what this means?

Thanks, Jan

Hallo,
die Arten der Stecker die du hier und in anderen Changesets verwendest sind nicht die in OSM üblichen Namen. Schau doch mal bitte ins Wiki und übernimm die Namen von dort:
osm.wiki/DE:Key:socket

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you added the key "charging_type" on these nodes - this tag is new and not used in other places. Essentially this information is not needed, because it can be read from the "output" tag.

On the other hand, one important piece of information is missing: Which sockets are available? socket=*
Could you add this?

Cheers, Jan