Hi, the trees you add have a strange tag: "2016 = 298". I corrected some yesterday, but there are more you added today. I guess it should be "ref = 2016.298". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you check this way?
way/480408120
The tag is wrong - and I don't know how to correct it. Looks like 'landuse = forest', but I can't see a forest here, just few individual trees.

Jan

Hi,
you added areas with strange tags that are not defined anywhere, like these:
area yes
area6 subarea6
name subarea6

What did you try to tag here? Some type of boundary? Please check the wiki on how to tag them properly, in the current state this data can not be interpreted by any standard software.

Jan

Hi, could you check the tagging of some of the buildings, e.g.

buildingxx:floor should be floor:material
building:walls should be building:material
building:roof should be roof:material

Those tags are described in the wiki, please check the other tags as well.

Jan

Hi,
you added 59 objects with the key 'bulding'. Would you mind fixing this? 'building'

Cheers, Jan

Do these streets really have the German name as part of their official name? If not, please use name:de for the German name.
Jan

Hi,
you used the keys "vertical height", "vertical_height", "vertical_rise" to map the height difference of aerialways. These tags are not used in any other place. Typically, start and end node of the aerialway are tagged with 'ele' to mark their respective height.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
den Key 'wheelchair:approachable' gibt es bis jetzt noch nicht. Ich würde da einfach "wheelchair = yes" setzen, und wenn es noch eine Einschränkung gibt mit "wheelchair:description" arbeiten.

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you added the tag 'with' on 29 ways. It should be spelled 'width' - could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan

Hallo,
"fee:no = yes" - das Tag gibt es nicht. Entweder fee=yes oder fee=no, was stimmt?
Gruss, Jan

Hi,
found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one:
way/480097548
Could you check & correct this?

Jan

Hi,
schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen:
way/47435488

Gruss, Jan

Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks weird.
node/4571244663

Jan

Hi,
you used various spellings of the same key:
'physically _challenged'
'physically_challenged'
'physically_ challenged'
'physically challenged'
Please, use only one spelling, otherwise the data is rather useless. Also, please use tags that are already in use and don't invent new ones. 'physically_challenged' is not a common term in OSM - a common tag is 'education:students' and 'disabled' - combine the two and you have 'education:students:disabled' which follows common tagging schemes and is easy to understand.

Jan

Hi,
what are all these nodes? None of them has any tag. Could you check this and / or delete them?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
are those 'meta' tags on this building really necessary? way/436232310

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you uploaded 220 objects with the tag "Yess = Building". Could you correct this? 'building=yes' would be correct.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
On this node you used some non-English keys to describe the object: node/4726295753

In OSM one must use common tags as described in the Wiki - otherwise the information can not be interpreted correctly by software. Please have a look to the wiki to find some better suited tags.

Cheers, Jan

Lass uns das per Mail besprechen, ich schreibe dir gerade.

Changed the tags back.