Hallo,
schau bitte mal nach deinen Richtungsangaben. Du verwendest z.B. direction_SW, aber das richtige Tag wäre "direction_southwest".

From a tagging point of view this is redundant. But I'm sure there are plenty tools that read tags on amenity=parking but ignore amenity=parking_space altogether.

We don't have a tagging scheme to say that a part of a amenity=parking has a maxstay. So the most useful mapping might be the splitting of the lot as you proposed.

This is one way to do it.
Another option:
You already mapped the individual parking spaces, so you can add the maxstay on these - similar to the disabled restriction you have on two of them.

Hi,
I'm fine with both versions.
We have several tags with an url in the key, e.g. ref:refuges.info
I think that's more straightforward than replacing the dot with an underscore.

In any case we should have the same tag everywhere, i.e. also on the restaurant nearby
node/8146599927/history

Thanks for the details.
I suggest to cut the parking in two pieces, one with maxstay = 20 minutes and one without. This would be the solution that can be understood by most tools.

Hi,
what is the meaning of 'capacity:timed'? This tag is not used in any other place.

Hi,
you added several different keys here:
reg_name:el-IT
reg_name:el-it
reg_name:el-it:

The first one would be the correct one: language in minor letters, country code in capital letters. Could you check and fix this?

Hi,
could you explain what this node represents? It doesn't have any common tag.

I had a closer look to these edits. They created tens of thousands of warnings and errors in JOSM. There are duplicates of existing buildings, untagged ways, rectangles that are much too large to resemble buildings and so on.
I reverted these uploads for now.

Please make sure that you only upload objects that are not yet present in OSM, that they have appropriate tags and honor all the warnings and errors JOSM displays before uploading. Please don't bulk upload huge amounts of data, but cut these edits down to sensible amounts of objects.

Hallo,
du hast einige Gebäude mit "ags" und "fid" Tags hochgeladen. Das sieht nach einem Versehen aus?

There are 3 areas:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1vNi

Hi,
something went wrong here. You uploaded a large amount of copies of existing objects. E.g. this:
way/1179924440
is a plain copy of the older

way/579622407

You also uploaded a large number of objects with a Id=0 tag but no useful tagging.

Please make sure you only upload new objects, and please split your edits in reasonable sized ones - uploading > 100,000 objects at once makes it hard to fix these problems.

Hi,
you added many round buildings here. Looking at the aerial images I think that most of them are no buildings but trees or bushes. Please check this.

Hi,
I'm also confused now. I think I found a tag you used in some earlier edits, but maybe I added the wrong one here ...

Hi,
you added some nodes with a new tag "naptan:ParentLocalityName = London" - shouldn't that be "naptan:ParentLocality"?

Hi,
the 'zone' key itself is perfectly fine - my comment was more about the "rouge" suffix which I don't understand.

Hi,
please check this way, it got a couple of strange tags:

way/1178180640

traffic_mode:foot;both = motor_vehicle
highway = *

Hi, "zone:rouge" is not a common tag.
I guess you wanted to add
parking:zone tags?
osm.wiki/Street_parking#Residential_parking_permits,_parking_zones

Please improve your internal QA! I'm fixing spelling mistakes in keys by commercial mappers almost every day. There is no "motor_car" in OSM.

Hi,
you added some strange "ODS:validator" tags - could you check that?