mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137610012 | Hi,
level = 1 -> this should be 'levels' nb_garage -> this tag should not appear in OSM, what does it mean? |
|
| 137409727 | These cases should be covered by restriction = no_stopping / no_standing / no_parking. Wiki says that the UK "no waiting" translates to no_parking which seems to make sense. Maybe you can extend the table for the restriction tag with a hint about UK street markings? |
|
| 137409727 | I'm not fully aware of the implications of a double yellow line in the UK, but wouldn't "parking lane is present but stopping is forbidden" be parking:both = lane
|
|
| 137409727 | Tagging should reflect the legal situation. Physically you can park your car diagonally on a 3 lane motorway... but legally you're not allowed (and shouldn't for obvious reasons) |
|
| 137409727 | Hi,
|
|
| 137495896 | Hi,
Actually most of the tags can be removed, just leaving "was:amenity=parking_space" to prevent other users from adding them again? |
|
| 137308841 | I tested 3 or 4 and none was working. E.g. https://www.bcmarinetrails.org/map_site/kaikash-creek |
|
| 137384608 | Hi,
|
|
| 137308841 | Hi,
|
|
| 137330751 | Please improve your QA procedures. I fix errors made by Grab employees almost every day. At least pay attention to warnings and errors shown by the JOSM validator! |
|
| 136629284 | Hi,
The reason for my edit was a different one: it's "colour" (British spelling) and not "color" |
|
| 137270359 | Hi,
|
|
| 136917764 | Hi,
How about some generic tagging and a description: amenity = checkpoint (used 200 times in various contexts)
Maybe access=private or permit is better depending on the actual situation Make sure the node is part of the highway so that a router sees the barrier. |
|
| 66991565 | Hi,
|
|
| 124939141 | Hi,
|
|
| 137104943 | Im Detail betrachtet sind es nicht nur 40 direkte Duplikate sondern auch hunderte von Geomtriefehlern die der Validator nicht findet, z.B. Knoten direkt nebeneinander die aber verbunden werden müssten, aufgeteilte Gebäude die maximal building:part wären. |
|
| 136992934 | Ok.
|
|
| 137104943 | Außerdem wurde hier von mindestens 40 Gebäuden Duplikate erzeugt, wie auch immer das passiert ist. |
|
| 137155460 | Hi,
Please have a look to the documented tags in the wiki or the presets in your editor and add one of these - only well-defined tags can be understood by other mappers and can be shown on maps and in applications. |
|
| 137125976 | Please stop uploading the same dataset again and again. All these >11000 objects don't contain any valid tag. I reverted theses edits. If these points actually contain any useful data for OSM, please follow our import rules before trying to upload them again:
|