OpenStreetMap
fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177635568 | Hi there, That makes sense, what you had written your comment didn't quite line up to your edit, and so I did assume your intention was to remove the relation entirely, not just one part, and that the partial change was a mistake. Thanks for confirming otherwise! |
|
| 177653407 | DWG revert - sockpuppet edits |
|
| 177653382 | DWG revert - sockpuppet edits |
|
| 177653369 | DWG revert - sockpuppet edits |
|
| 177653341 | DWG revert - sockpuppet edits |
|
| 177653267 | DWG revert - sockpuppet edits |
|
| 177635568 | Hi, you've only removed a single way from the relation, not removed the relation. The source you've linked doesn't appear to be one we can actually used, unless it's been released under an appropriate license (and the PDF itself doesn't state that). It also still shows Microcarpa Hike with nothing to show it's been removed. Can you confirm with an appropriate source that it's been removed (so the whole relation can be removed), otherwise this should be reverted to add that removed way back in. |
|
| 177630924 | Houses are assumed to be private, you can add access=private if you're concerned, but "Private Residence" as a name is just incorrect, we don't use the name tag for descriptive names, only actual names. |
|
| 177630980 | Hi, the private residence name shouldn't be added in here, that should just be drawn as a house without that as a name.
|
|
| 177630924 | Hi, adding nodes with nothing but a name isn't really ideal. I'd add a primary tag so they are actually classed as something.
|
|
| 177630722 | Hi, are these actually signed with the words "Water Tank" on them? Even if so, I don't think adding that as a name is any value, it's not a unique or distinctive name.
|
|
| 177633597 | DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account |
|
| 177633577 | DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account |
|
| 177613994 | DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account |
|
| 177613948 | DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account |
|
| 177613923 | DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account |
|
| 177281864 | Hi, looks like there's a typo in the house number for way/1467491633
|
|
| 177202796 | Hi there, this looks pretty good, only thing would be that if 2 and 4 Winchester Street don't share a wall, they shouldn't be joined together. If iD is wanting to snap them together, I'm happy to help fix that with JOSM or another editor.
|
|
| 177130181 | Hi, the section you've marked as service, is this just a one lane section? If so, it should probably still be residential and just tagged as a single lane.
|
|
| 177048763 | Hi, you've attached the corner of way/1465772868 to the park next to it.
|