Hi, when you're drawing buildings, it's a good idea to click the building outline once you've drawn it, and then press Q to square it off.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177050198

Hi there, for the changeset comment, it's better to describe what you're actually changing, otherwise it's not really giving any information to anyone. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some good examples.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177053624

Hi, the wikidata tag should use the Q ID, not the name of the item.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177069754

I've fixed them up in changeset/176962528 for an example of how building=house should be drawn.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176939353

Hi, since there's no physical split in the road, this shouldn't be mapped as two separate sections. Painted islands aren't counted for physical splits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176847619

I agree with JoeG, just because the terminology is American, it doesn't make the tag invalid and is commonly used in Australia. Those footway=sidewalk tags should all be restored.

On the split road, that really comes down to local preference. For a small island like that I generally wouldn't bother, but it's something that might be worth a discussion in the forum to see if there's a preference one way or the other.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176551989

Is "office=game development" a commonly used tag? I don't think it really is, this should probably go back to office=it, and a relevant sub-tag added if one exists.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176693411

Hi, you've added these as just name=Sump, what are these actually meant to be? The name tag is for signed names, not descriptive names.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176285210

The name is what I'm asking about, because if Extension isn't what is signed or part of the actual name, it shouldn't be included.

Is the new road actually named Ison Road Extension, or is it just an extension of Ison Road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176163579

Is Aston Hills actually a suburb, or just the name of that residential development? You haven't mentioned a source other than aerial imagery, something like this really needs one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176135487

Hi, Bing Imagery shows the driveway on the other side of the building, did you use different imagery for this or should this be corrected?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175970625

All good, it happens!

Hi, you've added these tags to the building for the office, not to the caravan park site itself. The building and office tags should be restored, and the name, brand:*, addr:*, tourism and website tags should go on the way covering the whole park.

The colon should be before the two slashes, I'll correct it for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175790635

Hi, please don't add fictional information into OSM. The farmland here should be drawn as individual plots, and the name and operator should only be added if this is (real) publicly known information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175480080

Hi, this looks pretty good, the only thing I would add is that it would be best to split the way where the tunnels are, and remove the tunnel=yes tag from any parts that aren't tunnels.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175604975

Hi, this seems like tagging for the renderer. Is this actually water, or is it meant to just be a wetland?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175139648

DWG revert - using copyrighted sources

changeset/175193863

I would probably also change those from highway=track to highway=service. They don't really look like tracks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174804039