Hi, there appears to be barriers going across sections of roadways you've drawn, it might be best to confirm with street level imagery or with better quality aerial imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179284064

Revert edit made with outdated imagery to restore the roundabout that now exists

changeset/179232515

I've confirmed that the ESRI imagery is 2025 whereas Bing is 2020, so I'll reverted this to restore the roundabout.

Hi, ESRI shows that this is actually a roundabout. Usually that is newer than Bing, have you been here and confirmed there isn't a roundabout? Otherwise, this should probably be reverted back to the roundabout.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179199491

They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110148

Hi, building=detached has about 8x more usage than house=detached in Australia, it's probably better to stick with that vs building=house and house=detached.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179106110

Hi, I don't think this would be considered a pipestem, it looks to just be a single rural property.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179041147

Hi, the path normally should extend to the roadway (and be joined to the way for that roadway) if they do join up through a kerb.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178970917

Hi Jaroro, the format for phone numbers should be +61 421 024 435 for mobile numbers, and +61 8 8323 7594 for landlines.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178763845

Hi, highway=path is more generic than highway=footway. If something is designed mostly for foot traffic but bicycles are still allowed, it should be kept as highway=footway and then bicycle=yes added to it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178662718

Hi, if the greens and other objects are inside the fairway, they should ideally be drawn as a multipolygon, otherwise you're actually drawing those areas as being both greens/bunkers and fairway at the same time.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178433769

Hi, your address on your website doesn't match this location. It also appears to be a residential location, is this an office where someone can come to at any time between 8am and 10pm Monday to Sunday?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178384855

Hi, ESRI imagery shows this driveway going through a building, can you please align it correctly?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178366608

Hi, this is still incorrect, you can see where the road deviates from what you've drawn, can you please correct this. The road is visible enough through the trees to draw this accurately.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178334743

Hi, you've also changed way/193087873 to be access=no, was this intentional, considering there are houses along here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178304362

The node has also been placed on the road, this should be detatched and moved to the correct location.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178319412

This seems incorrect, the road goes straight through a number of buildings according to Bing imagery. I've deleted it, please re-draw it correctly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178265352

Hi, can you make sure your changeset comments are relevant to the change, this looks like it's a template used for whenever you add a road or make a highway classification change, and doesn't make it obvious which of the two it actually is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177790281

Hi, you've merged a node used for Waldeck Oval with a node used in an administrative boundary way, these should be separate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177792402

Hi, these two nodes are still in the relation for the Glenelg Tram as stops, they should be removed and the new ones added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177703507