please contact maps.me for further support.

you have applied a housenumber to the whole building. Please note that a huge building like this in Italy likely will have a lot of housenumbers, not just one.

please do not add wikipedia pages into the website tag, there is an own key for this (wikipedia) and in the cases where you have added these tags, there has already been the information in the db. Please contact maps.me for further support.

there is a dedicated tag for wikipedia articles, these are not tagged like "website"s (because the key website is reserved for the official website of a feature)

it would be nice to also have a name for this guest house

the business name should go into the operator tag and not in the name tag. PLEASE DO NOT CAPITALIZE EVERYTHING. A place to sell gold is not a jeweller's

the guest house has been located in the middle of the street. I don't know what the tourist attraction is, but it unlikely has only a russian local name. The russian name should go into name:ru.

reverted changeset/40095636 because the chinese name doesn't belong into the name tag and the bus stop doesn't have a genuine chinese name

also here: chinese name in general name tag. I also doubt that a regional fast food in Italy has a genuine name (as opposed to a description)

there is a conceptual problem with this edit because in the name tag should be in the local language, and the chinese name was already in the appropriate name:zh tag

the name tag is only for _names_ and in the local language. Please, do not enter descriptions in the name tag.

Si, non è da cancellare il percorso in questo caso, visto che esiste ancora, cosa è da rimuovere è il "sentiero astratto", cioè il numero sul percorso ("ref") e il tag "operator" e in generale il tag "name" (205 non è un "nome").

what have you done here and why (there is no comment on the changeset)? I noticed that some names have been changed to latin (e.g. via della Fondamenta), did you check this on the ground?

removes area=yes from this way/23337719

this changed the name from one of the official names "Status Civitatis Vaticanæ" to "Civitatis Vaticanæ" which isn't an official name. I'm going to change this back, and will also add the other official name (in italian).

in this changeset some attributes got removed from the gates (access=private and housenumbers), I have put them back. Generally in Italy it is agreed to put the housenumbers on the gates and doors, because this is where they are assigned to. The amenity=parking is questionable because this is just normal parking in the street.

also see here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

this changeset spans half the world and the changeset comment is quite bad, as it doesn't provide any information as to what was changed, where or why. Also the amount of higher version ways and nodes that got deleted indicate a possible lack of respect towards other mapper's work. In particular I'd like to complain about way/251509915 which I had mapped after survey, and which was completely deleted (it was a clearly delimited landuse area). The building type was changed from "yes" (=any kind of building) to "office" and the disputed tag "office=government" was added, but I doubt that the mapper has knowledge about the building type in question (I wouldn't consider this an office type). Looks completely like an undiscussed semi-automatic edit to me. Please reply, I'm interested about the details and motivation, and I hope I am wrong with my assumptions.

Anche il changeset comment non sembra pertinente, vorrei segnalare questa pagina wiki nel merito: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
@Alecs01 suggerisco di contattare la DataWorkingGroup qui: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#Contact

please do not add duplicates, the station is already mapped in great detail