Du warst also auch nicht vor Ort?

ich weiß, dass andere DBs öfters die Ortsnamen in das Straßenfeld schreiben, weil sie das anders nicht abbilden können, aber hier gibt es eigentlich keinen Hinweis auf Import: changeset/43269170

Hi, der Name Fugging ist ja noch future_name, aber den Straßennamen hast Du ganz gelöscht?

Hi, I have seen you added shop=mall to the Castel Romano Outlet near Rome, but this is not really a shopping mall (enclosed space, inside), it is many shops connected through "regular" streets (outside).

Reckless action and pointless argument. If someone invents something and challenged for it, replies: prove to me that it doesn't exist, this is inverting the burden of proof.

Why have you been reinstalling the relation despite the open discussion on talk-it (which by the way did not really point towards undeleting the relation)?
This is clearly incompatible with the data working group comment.

Ciao MSa e benvenuto!
Un'osservazione: Il tag "image" non dovrebbe contenere un'elaborato grafico come un biglietto da visita, ma piuttosto una fotografia dell'esterno del palazzo.

Grazie,
Martin

Ciao,
non capisco questo way: way/852453710
mi puoi gentilmente spiegare dove lo hai visto? Su Esri World Imagery Clarity Beta non sembra ci sia un buco di queste dimensioni.

Grazie,
Martin

Ciao mcheck,

questo sembrerebbe un import, giusto?

in this changeset there are traffic light controlled crossing mistagged as crossings without lights

Congratulations for your 10.000th changeset!

@sabas88 a cosa ti riferisci?

https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placca_adriatica

if we agree on plate tectonics for determining the belonging, the eastern parts of Italy and significant parts of the po valley are geographically in Africa:
http://www.raon.ch/images/edu/haz3/eu_Bruchzonen16001.gif

talk-it is a mailing list for Italy.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

lorec, if you go by coast proximity, shouldn't the Sardegna be part of Tunisia then? Was Malta contained? What about Palagruža?

Clearly a mechanical edit. Unfortunately it introduced or reinforced quite some errors (in the end, a wikidata item is not the same as a wikipedia article, and it can well be possible that a wikipedia article link is a suitable fit for an OSM item while the related (to the article) wikidata object is not).
Has this ever been discussed according to the guidelines? I cannot recall any discussion, at least not with the German community.

+1 to revert because undocumented and undiscussed automated edit

sorry for the type, of course I meant crossing=traffic_signals

Hi Ludofru,
I just noticed you are using an English locale. Question is about crossing=marked. This is a very unspecific tag, I would encourage you to use crossing=zebra and crossing=traffic_lights instead. Thank you.
Martin