Ciao Ludofru,

ho visto che hai inserito degli highway=crossing con crossing=marked. Penso sarebbe meglio inserire gli incroci con le strisce (solo strisce) come crossing=zebra e quelle con i semafori crossing=traffic_lights. Che ne pensi?

Un saluto,
Martin

I agree with the deletion. Replying to @totera you wrote: "In the past irredentist movements that promoted the annexation of neighbouring regions to Italy have existed, but their claims were on ethnic and linguistic basis rather than geographic." -- claiming "italian geographical region" is not about physical "geography", it is about the cultural geography of humans (language, culture etc.), there is no other meaning in "italian" or "italic" than a cultural one.

Hi, I have noticed you have tagged some traffic lights controlled highway=crossing nodes with crossing=marked. Please use a more specific tag, e.g.
crossing=traffic_lights and
crossing=zebra

Thank you.

Martin

ciao, ho visto che hai taggato questo nodo con barrier=yes
node/7271935670
significa che non si può oltrepassare la recinzione su quei percorsi oppure c'è un apertura? Nel primo caso metterei barrier=fence sul nodo (oppure taglierei vicino alla recenzione un pezzo del way)

ci sono altri semafori spariti in questo changeset, per esempio node/566522680, node/1130864337

Hi Fluffy, it seems your edits in the area were not accurate, could you please explain where your information comes from, or which sources you used? Thank you

Ciao Città di Palmi,
ho notato che hai creato questo landuse=residential way/806402228 che contiene di tutto e di più (qualsiasi landuse, compreso strade ecc.). Mentre non è "vietato" procedere in questa maniera (cominciare grezzo e poi andare più al fino), ti vorrei proporre di non farlo e di creare più "isole" di landuse invece di uno grande che comprende una zona vasta (un intero villaggio), perché per successive modifiche è più facile operare su poligoni piccoli che su quelli grandi (e anche perché così si evita di inglobare aree di farmyard, industriali, chiese ecc. in residential landuse). Sarebbe meglio di non legare i landuse al centro della strada ma di lasciarli finire ai confini delle particelle. Questo è solo un mio parere, ovviamente sei libero a fare come ti pare :)

Un saluto
Martin

Das ist ziemlich klar ein nicht abgestimmter automatischer Edit. Weitere Infos hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=798173#p798173

Ciao Gluca, ho visto che hai rimosso il tag natural=spring da Node: Fonte di Santo Stefano (742648750)
Non è una sorgente?

Un saluto
Martin

scusa, ho ritrovato i stabilimenti, mi ero sbagliato nella posizione

non capisco perché hai cancellato la versione 6 di Piazzale Aldo Moro per poi ricreare un’altra versione, ed hai cancellato anche i stabilimenti perenni sulla spiaggia per ricrearne degli stabilimenti anonimi, perché?

all right, I’ll fix it. Please do not add crossing details like crossing=* from aerial imagery, it is not possible to distinguish traffic light controlled crossings from zebra crossings in Rome, because all have zebra markings. Thank you, Martin

Hi, I just noticed you surveyed in 2018 that here are no traffic lights: node/5730658123
I thought I remember that there are, can you please confirm? Thank you, Martin

Hi, I have seen that you are adding footway=sidewalk tags to (virtual) footway crossing ways (the ways that connect sidewalks at crossings). Please use footway=crossing for these footways (together with highway=footway). Thank you.

OK, thank you, I have removed it now.
Have fun mapping!

Hi rusefkuma, can you recall why you added this obelisk and how it did look like? Maybe it was just a confusion and is refering to the monumental Lateran Obelisk in the centre of St. Peter's square? In this case I suggest to remove this object. Please reply, if you do not reply I will remove the thing in the next days. Thank you.

The reason why I was asking is that I do not believe there is an obelisk there, for sure there isn't an ancient monumental obelisk there (maybe a modern small version), but from looking at the tags there is eventually something like a memorial (plate) with an inscription that refers to an obelisk. AFAIK this part of the vatican isn't open to the public, so likely the position is just wrong and the thing is referring to the Lateran Obelisk in the centre of St. Peter's square.

Can you describe from where you copied the inscription text? I will probably delete this obelisk duplicate at the wrong position, but would try to save useful tags by transferring them to the correct object, if they can be confirmed.

I did not check "your edits" of course, I just noticed you have added wikidata tags to a supposed phantom obelisk, where the actual obelisk is already mapped 200 meters to the east at its actual position. There is no point in doing "manual verification" of automatically adding wikidata tags, when there is no verification at all. I am not going to undo your edits, but I would ask you to actually verify what you add.

see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=794408