Also the user is either actively trying to hide his identity and other pseudonyms within the OSM community or he is a genius and really a new user who has found out just 2 days after signing up, that this particular relation type is useless and how to delete them in a huge area. I tend to believe the former and think that the reason for hiding behind a newly created user is that he is well aware of the controversity of his edit.

I am for reverting this changeset:

1. The user has very likely violated the community guidelines for automated / semitautomated changes (not looked individually at every object he deleted).

2. Deleting this amount of data should generally not be decided unilaterally on an individual basis, even more if it happens far from the home of the user, and when the user is not able to communicate with the local community (user speaks no Italian and has problems with English). This shows some disrespect towards the local mapping community.

should likely also have a place of worship tag

changes the importance of the SP25 from tertiary to secondary. By looking at the map I dispute this decision, seems as if the alternative SP25bis is correctly the secondary road there.

if you can (and there is), please also add a name

the turn restrictions look suspicious. I have no local knowledge but I suppose there are access tags missing on the private road, rather than turn_restrictions.

Changeset without any information added. Graffiti. I will revert this changeset. Please do not add nonesense to the database, you are harming the project.

please DO NOT CAPITALIZE, use normal capitalization. Also, do not repeat the same information in tags where they do not belong (source is about the source of an edit, name is the name of a feature, the value of description should be in English, use description:it for Italian descriptions.)

did not revert because it seems as if user mcheckimport has already resolved the issues that have been created.

this changeset seems to have created problems without adding anything useful. I have reverted this changeset.

this is a malicious edit which adds some places at fictious locations. I have reverted the edit. Please do not upload test data, this will be considered vandalism.

This newbie edit does not add new information (save the "operator" info contained in the "name" tag), because there is already an area with more detailed tagging. I deleted the node but copied the operator information to the area.

highway type is likely not living street. Driveway is not connected.

I have reverted this changeset because it didn't contain any contribution but created pointless nodes (untagged, in linear and straight roads) and untagged overlapping ways. Please do NOT upload tests.

I have reverted this changeset because it didn't contain significant contributions as far as I've seen, but did contain some significant deletion.

looks as if the postamat was moved accidentally...

non è un ospedale, chiedo di modificare il tagging. Suggerisco di guardarsi il healthcare 2.0 proposal nella wiki

something obviously went wrong here, either a software problem or vandalism

seems suspicious to me, have not yet understood what the user actually did (seems nothing), but is a newbie and the geo-extent is definitely strange.

Yes, I have tried to do so, but have not gotten any reply so far. This would only help to get the address though, I am not sure that a private person offering some hours of mathematics repetition is enough to be on the map, at least there is no common tagging at the moment, and the name-tag surely isn't a good place to put a description.