no comment, just deletions. Likely vandalism.

this changeset is clearly vandalism. Deleting of valid stuff is not tolerable, even if you recreated the things later, it is still violating object history. I'm going to revert this changeset.

please add comments to describe what you have done

Please be more specific with your changeset descriptions. "fix bad country" doesn't allow to understanding what you were doing or why.

Please note that place=locality is 100% wrong for a used building. It is a tag for an uninhabited place with a name. It can't be inside a city. It is a generic tag for an unspecific toponym (i.e. a more specific tag would normally be better).

Ciao Federico, anch'io sostengo che l'uso del suolo deve essere taggato soltanto sulle aree effetivamente usati in quella maniera. Le strade sono da escludere (sono landuse=highway). Le aree, diverso delle strade "highway", devono essere mappate al loro vero confine. Altrimenti si creano problemi (per esempio con recinzioni che non si trovano più al confine dell'area, oppure con oggetti vicini alla strada, che altrimenti risulterebbe appartenenti all'area adiacente).

yes, I'd generally suggest not using the building objects for the businesses inside, but use distinct objects. This is helpful because a business and a building are different things (e.g. regarding the start_date, maybe operator, wikipedia links, name, etc.)

My suggestion is to make it several objects, or use attributes (e.g. rental=bikes). amenity_2 and similar will not go anywhere. You could make a polygon for the cafe and add the bicycle tool stand as a node inside this polygon and have the tags just there.

suspicious changeset. Contains a lot of deletions.

contains a lot of deletions, regarding the deleted ways clearly vandalism.

this is a changeset consisting mostly of deletions of small wooden areas. Even after a year no alternative has been presented, so I consider this vandalism.

There is at least one problem here: this node/3711236775 is a duplicate of another node Gianicolense. Please delete the newer node or fix the name and/or tags to make this more consistent and readable.

FrViPofm, can you tell me where this data comes from? Is it available only for France or also for other regions?

Is this an active school? Then there should also be a way around the whole site with the tag amenity=school
If there is religious affiliation I'd also add the tags religion=christian and denomination=catholic (or whatever it is).

ist der Rossmann ins UG umgezogen? Als ich den gemappt habe war er noch oben, bilde ich mir ein.

well done

this restaurant should likely be inside and not between the building and the road. Please move

The way that was introduced in this changeset
Way: 214125180
Is not an alley. Not at all possible. Please fix (maybe no service-subtag might be better than the clearly wrong service=alley)

I have also surveyed this alley, last time I've been there this wasn't a highway=pedestrian, and if it is now they would have had to tear down a lot of buildings (very narrow, ie not pedestrian which implies a larger width)

clearly a bad changeset, deleted coastline and administrative boundary, but the mapper is new and maybe this was not intentional...

why was this fountain deleted?