democat's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172345953 | Hi there, these roads are not private access, as the public can drive along these roads at any hours of the day without restriction. |
|
| 179211403 | Why do you follow the right edge of the lane instead of the actual centerline? There are also weird kinks in the entrance/exit ramps to/from the service road. Also, you are being particularly passive-aggressive with these changeset comments, despite not putting your own comment on the original changeset that made these geometry changes. |
|
| 177062179 | Hey there! I'd like to ask why you counted lanes that weren't fully formed (you counted lanes from when they start emerging from the curb, not from when they're done emerging), which conflicts with this section in the wiki: osm.wiki/Lanes#Street |
|
| 177487460 | Hey there, thanks for your change! There's no need to split these streets unless something changes with their tags, like road surface or lane count. Also, landuses should generally not share nodes with roads, since they make it hard to change the landuses separate from the road way.
|
|
| 50570851 | boundary=census must be closed, why is this tag only applied to this part of the full Tucson boundary? |
|
| 177104991 | Hello, I believe CROF in the building name needs to be expanded to its full title, as abbreviations are usually not allowed in names. DART is fine as that is one of its official names |
|
| 177100622 | Hi there, and thanks for your change! The operator tag additions are nice, but I don’t think the name of a track should be named after the service that runs on it - that’s what the route relations are for. The tracks are physically for light rail vehicles, and technically any DART LRV can traverse the tracks without being on the red/blue line, so the name field should be reverted to DART Light Rail.
|
|
| 176924629 | Looks good to me!
|
|
| 168975089 | at least in Sachse it is |
|
| 168975089 | Isn't SH 78 signed on the ground as the street name though? |
|
| 175937403 | Hey there, and thanks for your contribution! This edit looks OK! If you're adding a business, be sure to add a new point with specific tags. |
|
| 175925047 | Hey again, thanks for the edits! The comment for the other edit stands: school tags are better on School Grounds areas rather than individual points, unless the school is only one part of an existing building. For Jones MS, the point looks a little misplaced - and that too, would be better as a School Grounds area if possible. |
|
| 175923447 | Hey there, welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! Regarding the review requested: since there is an existing School Grounds area enclosing the school, you should edit/add the tags on that instead of placing a new node. |
|
| 154532925 | Hey there, thanks for your contribution! For the future, do you think you could not connect the landuses directly to highways (including sidewalks)? It makes it hard to update the geometry of the landuse and the adjacent highway later. |
|
| 175291033 | Hey there, I'm curious as to why you decided to upgrade this road to secondary. All it seems to do is connect these neighboring residential areas to the larger roads north and south of it, and it isn't really acting as a connector for through traffic yet. |
|
| 175073249 | I've never seen a utility box with an address, woah. Can you also add some tags to indicate it's a utility box? Maybe `man_made=street_cabinet`, along with `utility=*` and `ref=*` keys. |
|
| 169688537 | Hello again! What's the source on Trinity Falls Pkwy in McKinney being median-separated south of Crescent? Esri and the newest imagery I can find still suggest that road is only on the east side. |
|
| 175073249 | This address is in the middle of an intersection. Did you mean to add it elsewhere? |
|
| 175831183 | Hey there, thanks for your contribution! Can you add the name of the apartment complex to a new area for the apartment complex itself, and then add the building number to the "ref=" key? The complex name should not be in the building name. |
|
| 175809582 | Hey there, thanks for your contribution! I'm surprised there were this many traffic lights missing, tbh. Can I ask why you removed the `highway=crossing` tags where sidewalks intersected driveways? |