OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
95775821

Should the amenity=post_office node inside this area be removed?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95775821

85405834

I suspect you are right (I'm going to assume that Puerto Mutis doesn't have a road called "Vía Puerto Mutis"). should I revert changeset # 95765570 where I removed the noname=yes tag?

95764795

thanks for aligning this road. great improvement! :)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95764795

95738787

Building has been edited. You can see the change here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/884220518
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95738787

95738787

Feedback: only add points at the corners of the building. make sure you trace only the outline of the roof (not any shadows) - can be hard to tell the difference some times. square off your buildings too.

I'll will edit and show you the difference...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95738787

95761606

thanks for the additional detail for this building.

p.s. don't forget to "square" your buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95761606

95762968

Suggested improvements: square off your buildings (use the 'q' shortcut in iD editor); write longer changeset comments.

Questions: how did you determine the height and building levels for the mapped buildings? If you aren't surveying that data on the ground, don't guess it from satellite imagery.

=== español ===
Mejoras sugeridas: cuadre sus edificios (use el acceso directo 'q' en el editor de iD); escribir comentarios más largos del conjunto de cambios.

Preguntas: ¿cómo determinó la altura y los niveles de construcción de los edificios mapeados? Si no está midiendo esos datos en tierra, no lo adivine a partir de imágenes de satélite.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95762968

95763321

thanks for the edits! Don't forget to add high quality comments so others can understand the intent of your changes. :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95763321

85405834

While reviewing validator errors for this area, I identified that way # 556821743 has conflicting tags as a result of this changeset. Since you added a name for the road, I will remove the noname=yes tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85405834

95739588

This change also seems to have resulted in the island no longer being mapped. It is likely your change will be reverted.

See https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588/ or https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=95739588 to see the visual change.

95739588

Please ensure you provide good changeset comments so other mappers can understand the intent of your change. "k" is not a good comment. :(
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588

95517088

correction: fixing issues identified by osm inspector (mostly access restrictions on roads).

82180200

Hi Shawn! It looks like this changeset accidently realigned Walsh Rd (east end of the changset) to it's historic alignment rather than the new alignment.

We're fixing it up but always worth checking the newer imagery (e.g. maxar) to ensure changes are valid. :)

92392786

Also - keeping your changesets small (just a few changes) and giving a descriptive comment for the change is very helpful.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments is a useful guide

Here's an example of a small correction I made: changeset/92430445

92392786

You can see the adjustments I made here: changeset/92430345

92392786

Hi. Thanks for the contribution to the map...

Some feedback to help you develop your mapping skills:
- Try and "square off" buildings when you draw their outline. See https://bit.ly/33VClZP
- Try and map the schools in more detail. see https://bit.ly/33VDctv
- Try and ensure the extent of the building / area is mapped. e.g. the way marking Cloone Graveyard should be expanded.
- For shops and restaurants that occupy a building, map the building and then add a node for the specific amenity (e.g. shop, fast food outlet, etc).
- Map what you can see and reference the sources you used (e.g. survey, mapillary, etc). This helps with validation of changes.
- Try and capture the number of levels in the building.
- Be careful with spelling.

If I can be of any assistance, please drop me a message.

37397205

Can you provide a source for the location of Glebe Lodge? The National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (NIAH) doesn't list it but I did find some references elsewhere indicating it was in this area.

71534675

Hello!

I'm trying to understand your use of recycling:cans=garden on node/6566157102 (it's an unusual value for that tag). Can you provide some context? Thanks!

73472351

Hi! I'm cleaning up some recycling values that don't match common usage. For node # 6721715944, you mapped a recycling container that only accepts cans. If it only accept cans, you can use recycling:cans=yes (the current guidance is to map one node per container so if other items were accepted here, those containers would specify what was accepted in them).

Hope that helps!

43864959

Hello! I'm cleaning up some data that has unusual values. For node # 4514989782, can you explain what it is?

Xin chào! Tôi đang dọn dẹp một số dữ liệu có giá trị bất thường. Đối với nút # 4514989782, bạn có thể giải thích nó là gì không?