dónal's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 95775821 | Should the amenity=post_office node inside this area be removed?
|
|
| 85405834 | I suspect you are right (I'm going to assume that Puerto Mutis doesn't have a road called "Vía Puerto Mutis"). should I revert changeset # 95765570 where I removed the noname=yes tag? |
|
| 95764795 | thanks for aligning this road. great improvement! :)
|
|
| 95738787 | Building has been edited. You can see the change here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/884220518
|
|
| 95738787 | Feedback: only add points at the corners of the building. make sure you trace only the outline of the roof (not any shadows) - can be hard to tell the difference some times. square off your buildings too. I'll will edit and show you the difference...
|
|
| 95761606 | thanks for the additional detail for this building. p.s. don't forget to "square" your buildings.
|
|
| 95762968 | Suggested improvements: square off your buildings (use the 'q' shortcut in iD editor); write longer changeset comments. Questions: how did you determine the height and building levels for the mapped buildings? If you aren't surveying that data on the ground, don't guess it from satellite imagery. === español ===
Preguntas: ¿cómo determinó la altura y los niveles de construcción de los edificios mapeados? Si no está midiendo esos datos en tierra, no lo adivine a partir de imágenes de satélite.
|
|
| 95763321 | thanks for the edits! Don't forget to add high quality comments so others can understand the intent of your changes. :)
|
|
| 85405834 | While reviewing validator errors for this area, I identified that way # 556821743 has conflicting tags as a result of this changeset. Since you added a name for the road, I will remove the noname=yes tag.
|
|
| 95739588 | This change also seems to have resulted in the island no longer being mapped. It is likely your change will be reverted. See https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588/ or https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=95739588 to see the visual change. |
|
| 95739588 | Please ensure you provide good changeset comments so other mappers can understand the intent of your change. "k" is not a good comment. :(
|
|
| 95517088 | correction: fixing issues identified by osm inspector (mostly access restrictions on roads). |
|
| 82180200 | Hi Shawn! It looks like this changeset accidently realigned Walsh Rd (east end of the changset) to it's historic alignment rather than the new alignment. We're fixing it up but always worth checking the newer imagery (e.g. maxar) to ensure changes are valid. :) |
|
| 92392786 | Also - keeping your changesets small (just a few changes) and giving a descriptive comment for the change is very helpful. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments is a useful guide Here's an example of a small correction I made: changeset/92430445 |
|
| 92392786 | You can see the adjustments I made here: changeset/92430345 |
|
| 92392786 | Hi. Thanks for the contribution to the map... Some feedback to help you develop your mapping skills:
If I can be of any assistance, please drop me a message. |
|
| 37397205 | Can you provide a source for the location of Glebe Lodge? The National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (NIAH) doesn't list it but I did find some references elsewhere indicating it was in this area. |
|
| 71534675 | Hello! I'm trying to understand your use of recycling:cans=garden on node/6566157102 (it's an unusual value for that tag). Can you provide some context? Thanks! |
|
| 73472351 | Hi! I'm cleaning up some recycling values that don't match common usage. For node # 6721715944, you mapped a recycling container that only accepts cans. If it only accept cans, you can use recycling:cans=yes (the current guidance is to map one node per container so if other items were accepted here, those containers would specify what was accepted in them). Hope that helps! |
|
| 43864959 | Hello! I'm cleaning up some data that has unusual values. For node # 4514989782, can you explain what it is? Xin chào! Tôi đang dọn dẹp một số dữ liệu có giá trị bất thường. Đối với nút # 4514989782, bạn có thể giải thích nó là gì không? |