The advantage of putting them in OHM is that the start and finish dates are supported .. and the old data is encouraged. The argument is that OSM is for current conditions not the past.
I think ORM should consider using both OSM and OHM, OSM for the present .. and OHM for the past when the users want that.

Hi
The raised railway belongs in Open Historic Map ..

"In locations where the railway has been replaced by new buildings and roads, the mapping of such features becomes out of scope for OpenStreetMap."

Sixmaps are COPYRIGHT!!!!!

They MUST NOT BE USED in OSM!

LPI (now DCS) are to be used... I can only assume you used the LIP base map as that is what is provided though the OSM editors...

Hi,

The pitch 27630391 you say has soccer played on it... yet I cannot see any goal posts? Is this just for social games .. without goals?

I have separated the baseball/softball pitches up - there are 3 of them. My thinking is the more detail the better.

Hi
Private?

Named as Mores Road.. marked as tertiary on DCS Base Map .. I don't think this through road can be 'private' in any way?

Perhaps you mean the Uni research place .. but that is only 'on' the road .. the road itself is open access?

No response... I hope this is not a typical MSFTOpenMaps action.

Beast? Should be 'Best'!

Hi,

The JOSM validator would have identified 'self crossing ways' as a warning .. these should be fixed before upload. I pick them up from an OSM QA tool, see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.38409&lat=-35.14381&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The errors are on ways 1096817765, 1096822238, 1096822235 and 1096822227. These have all been last edited by yourself. Would you mind fixing these errors? I believe we learn best by fixing our own errors.

Let me know if you need help.

Yet another self crossing way ...Way: 1094337103

Learn not to do this .. or you are going to leave many of them scattered around using maproulette.

No response.

Hi,

Building Way: 1096208655 crosses it self. This is an error you should fix. Beast imagery here is the DCS Imagery.

A gap in a route relation that is a few kilomerters long and there might be some chance of finding it. A gap in the India Pacific train line that is a few meters long .. no chance. What helped was the gap was used by a few routes.

Best? Contact the previous mappers.. note the 's'.. some are not interested in the route but make changes to the line that effects the route... I generally try to keep an eye on the sydney train routes - in particular the longer ones.

If you are going to come back and fix it your self .. I'd not make the gap, just leave it untill you can replace it. This would leave the route functional even if using a fictional section.

If you look at bing then you'd see that this is 2 houses .. not one.

Node: 10100956488 is a duplication of Node: 6684811067.

I'll leave this for you to look at ...

Hi
The RSL looks to have been sold ...
https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-sa-port+germein-134472910

Hi,
The basketball/tennis court ... the imagery only shows basketball so I have changed it.
If you are surveying it please say so in your source comment with the changeset?

Reverted.

The DCS Imagery in this area of the world is better than bing.

Please do not realign to bing existing OSM objects unless you have more information.

Hi,
Changing Way: 689401624 to only "fixme"="does not exist" has caused me some hours of work to find where train route relations have been broken .. train routs such as Perth to Sydney, Dubbo to Sydney ...

Me, quietly bashing head against wall...

A roof is always above ground, layer=-1 says it is below ground... Both roofs are now tagged as layer=1 i.e. above ground.

There is nothing dedicated.. at the moment I can see.

I'd use the description key for example description=Supports sports by provision of showers, changing rooms, meeting room and canteen. The club key is for clubs ... so that the wrong thing to do. There is a shower, dressing room and a canteen tag that could be used to indicate there presence, nothing for meeting rooms though.. at least on the wiki.. there is the use of meeting_room=yes .. 11 occurrences.

A 'roof' is always above ground...