Hi,
The building Way: 1080747306 on Kaleen Ground you have tagged as a club=sport, sport=soccer;cricket ... what is the name of the club?

Redfern Train Staion:

Train lines are at layer 0.

Platforms should be at the same layer.

The walk ways go over the train line .. so they should be at layer=1 - same as the road way and cycle way ...

I have attempted to change this to where it should be.

Hi

Building levels should be integer numbers not 'elevator'. There are at least 20 of these, I've only looked along the Richmond line .. I expect more of them with a complete search. ... I'll simply delete the lot?

Hi
wetland overlaps waterway ... which is it?

Ways 1030893405 & 1030893306...

Perfection is hard to achieve, and even harder to maintain!

As long as it is a reasonable representation of what is there I'd call it good.

Hi,
The relation/14652383 'Hire Depot' is not correct.

First the tag 'building=yes' says that the entire area is a building.

Second a multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. This feature does not require a relation; simply map the outside of the area and label that with the name, shop and possibly 'landuse=retail'

The layer key is used to indicate that something is physically higher or lower than something else... there is none of that here.

A comment: when you alter something look for the existence of the tag 'source=*' .. if you are using a different source .. simply delete the tag 'source=*'

Strange! It did show as an 'outer' see relation/6836233/history ...
Arr . I changed it by accident in version 6 on 30/9/22 when I add some 9 more members.. I must have changed it to meet the validator upload messages .. forgetting I had sent you the message. Apologies.

Thanks Nev .. re entered. It maybe a very small field within the cricket circle in the bing imagery... but too hard to make it out.

Hi,
I don't see AFL at Karragullen Oval, I have removed it (and added an r to the name). I did a google to see if I could find it but no luck there. Did you mean rugby? There is some trace that could be rugby on bing.

This and other edits have broken train route relations.

Learn how not to break the relations by fixing the many that you have broken!

I have set this to a site relation.

This avoids the error of shared segments in a multipolygon relation outer ways. Been ~2 months since the error was noted.

Hi,

An error in the relation 6836233 - wood. Way: Lake Elizabeth (198991852) should have the role 'inner' inside the relation.

I'll let you fix it so you can examine it.

Keep mapping, humans make errors and I think we all learn best by fixing our own mistakes.

Hi,

I have changed some boundaries of adjacent parks to what I think is more correct DCS Base Map boundaries.. approximately.
Ones of concern are
Way: Princes Park (203021850) and Way: Norford Park (186995446). See what you think ...

I have used JOSM validator to further check this changeset:

Highways crossing barrier fences ... 4 in this changeset but others also evident from past entries. These need to have the barriers removed from the highway .. or some gated entry provided. Barrier Way: 1096276941, Way: 1096276939 and Way: 1096276960.

Highway Way: 1096276958 connected to building, Way: 1096276959

Past messages about errors have been ignored, this one will probably be the same?

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.99623&lat=-32.03919&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The building way self intersects ... you should fix this.

Note: The iD reported warnings of "crossing highway/waterway" and "impossible one way highway" are worth investigating.

Err ... 'australian_football' ... looks like rugby to me. Altered.

Hi,

There has been some dragging of at least 2 nodes by this changeset...

node/7429152706 dragged south east, makes build way cross it self
node/6682975699 dragged north west, makes a badly mapped tree cross itself. The badly mapped tree has been done by a mapper in 2019 and they only have some 20 edits...

Bit mystified as to why... looks like the nodes were changed without realizing they were 'inuse'???

I have left them alone so you can view them ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.10137&lat=-37.77889&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi
The building multipolygon relation/14591280 is not correct.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.10084&lat=-35.22185&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I would suggest you delete the relation and place tag 'building=residential' on the remaining 3 ways. I'll leave it to you to correct the situation?

Arr
Got it from council web site
Thanks - don't bother to respond. :)