Hi,
If your only changing cliff lines why then were relations changed???

Note relation/10121936 has been deleted. This change set has been partial reverted and the relations are restored. The cliff lines should be fine.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Unfortunately this change set broke the administration boundaries for King Island Council, Currie and Loorana.
I have reverted some of the data you entered to restore these admin. boundaries. I don't think that will have much effect on the data you entered.

Hi,
What is the source of the name "Pine plantation"?
Note this relation has 2 errors ... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.85402&lat=-37.58770&zoom=14

Unfortunately these boundary things are hard in OSM. I get tripped up by them from time to time, why I look for them.
Don't worry about making errors, as long as your contributing good data your fine.

Still present and still mapping.

This created a multipolygon for a residential area - relation/11155419. This has an error - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.59740&lat=-31.50354&zoom=15

I would simplify this into 2 independent ways - no need for a relation at all.

Hi,
Sorry, I got the way number wrong ... it is way/837367740. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.46219&lat=-33.07096&zoom=18

relation/10586171 Ambleside admin boundary has 2 outers that touch... that is an error.

Take a look at https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.38234&lat=-41.17948&zoom=11

And destroyed admin boundaries that existed along this road.... mutter mutter.

way/5573399 - a building ... crosses it self. This generates errors.
Better - separate the 2 buildings. Tag the one that has the driveway leading to it as a garage, the other as a house. If you want the rear section is a deck under a roof - the house can be separated from both.. and I'd only map the roof layer=1 .. I'd have to lookup how to do a deck.

Hi
Looks like the way/652141892, which was the boundary of a preserve .. has been turned into a cycle way and then deleted. Result .... reserve is destroyed... Please be carefull.

I have done a partial reversion of this and another of your changesets to restore the reserve. This may have some effect on your edits.

Hi,

Multipolygon relation outers cannot touch so this relation generates errors.

In principle - one OSM entry = one real world feature. So I would have the club as a simple node. Then the buildings can each be a simply way, thus no relation required.

Hi,
relation/11092899 has 2 members both as outers.... one is inside the other?

Fingers crossed.
Would be 'nice' to separate things up into categories - land cover, land use, admin, poi and then be able to edit within the category only.

Hi,
Looks like Panorama Heights is already included in East Devonport...

Relation: 11294143 has no name...

Way: 825314996 is already in Relation: Ambleside (10586171) so does not need to be included again...

Hi,
looks like this change set separated Prossers Regional Reserve into 2 ways? They look to be adjoining... so could be one simple way?

I have removed the 'landuse=forest' from the Bicentennial Gardens. The way is the boundary of the gardens and includes areas that do not have trees. I have added a new relation for these trees - it extends beyond the gardens. See relation/11515585

Hi,
way/399812799 is the boundary of the Talawahl Nature Reserve and should not be modified to be the boundary of an area of trees. In addition several ways have been changed that have altered the Talawahl Nature Reserve boundaries.

Secondly ... an area of trees is better tagged natural=wood. This does not imply a land use of forestry which is used for State Forests. And the key 'natural' is use for both natural and man effected things.

Third? Try not to use existing ways that are not related to what is being mapped. For example trees don't always follow the boundary of a National Park, Nature reserve etc.

This change set has been reverted as I found it too difficult to correct the altered boundaries. Sorry.

Hi,
Regarding node/6770404780 tagged as an artwork.
Is this not a memorial to Matthew Flinders and his cat Trim? In which case it would be better tagged as a historic=memorial, memorial=statue, description=Matthew Flinders and his cat trim ???

way/682056525 'named' swamp? I think that is, at best, a description not a name. Better tagged as wetland=swamp.