Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 90091560 | Hi,
And has been deleted, as have all the other entries in this changeset. Please do not add phantom things to OSM. |
|
| 90138110 | Hi,
This could be a simple closed way instead of a relation. In any event it needs fixing. |
|
| 90222249 | Hi,
Keep mapping, try to fix these errors .. if you need help you can ask here or elsewhere. |
|
| 90070351 | Still not fixed. |
|
| 90076628 | Hi, Relation outer ways cannot share segments .. sorry but that is not on. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.79639&lat=-19.29211&zoom=18 Humm how about a simple way - map the extent of the property - fence lines to foot path and tag that as the motel? You already have the buildings etc. |
|
| 90070351 | No comment.
And creating errors! Not the way to make a hole in a way, a multipoygon relation must be used. For the error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.28337&lat=-36.80089&zoom=15 For the way to fix it see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.
|
|
| 90056184 | Hi,
The parking relation you made relation number 11553273 has an error the outer ways share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.13472&lat=-33.77760&zoom=18. I suggest deleting the relation and using each simple way to tag the two parking areas. |
|
| 90094661 | An example of building=roof is a carport - no walls!
I leave it to you to correct entries you have made with building=roof as appropriate. |
|
| 90094661 | Hi,
The relation crated for the Sydney Harbour Marriott Hotel (relation number 11555596) has no area.
I have deleted the relation. |
|
| 89774524 | Deleted landuse=industrial relation/11528658 - one member that is a straight line .. encloses nothing. Woowookarung Regional Park??? Tagged as natural=wood? Not all trees! Why is it not tagged amenity=park? |
|
| 85079551 | No response. Corrected. Both members were modified to stop shared segments. |
|
| 85413956 | Errors:
relation/11117034 outer ways share segments. This is an error.
|
|
| 86156472 | The relation/610910 has the name etc for the Jawbone Flora and Fauna Reserve, it should not be added to the outer ways.
|
|
| 86156533 | Reverted The tag boundary=protected area is enough. |
|
| 89879650 | Hi nevw!
|
|
| 89852186 | Hi,
If you mean to change the rendering of some map to reflect what you want .. then sorry, but no. The rendering of conservation areas should not be changed by tagging them as a nature reserve. In any case these ways for Scott Creek Conservation Park as a 'nature reserve' are duplicates of what is already in place.. so I have deleted them. |
|
| 89770263 | Welcome to OSM. This change set encompasses a very large area! First the landuse=residential areas in Adelaide. Any reason why these are separated into blocks? They don't need to be separated as far as I can see, would save some work to do the entire area as one simple way. Melbourne...
|
|
| 85223123 | relation/11101134 has 2 outters... still an error.
|
|
| 85697075 | Hi,
|
|
| 74604208 | If you tag access=private then some maps can show that, and some routers will not route through it. I'd also tag surface=unpaved if appropriate as this dissuades some. |