I have no idea what the changeset comment of Kioloa means. Arrr ... just an area... but what are you doing there?

There have been changes to the tree area relation that have broken it... Please make your changeset comments better? This helps me in repair any errors that may have been made.

Hi,

The relation for the residential area is not closed (as in not a closed area). To help in drawing these areas a look at the LIP Base Map is useful.

Some possible errors.. from the LPI base map...

The present track 'Hicks Road' (way/785502339) looks to be Ferndale Road at the western end. I don't see a 'Hicks Road' on the LPI base Map.

The present unclassified 'Ferndale Road' (way/785502338) looks to be a track and unnamed.

Hi,

The 'rubbish imported data' at least indicates that there is something here and about where it is. The alternative is a blank map with the notation 'there be dragons'.

In some decades the present gps data too could be regarded as 'rubbish'. We each contribute, adding and improving... please continue to contribute, but don't publicly degenerate others contributions no matter how you feel about it. Ok?

Hi,
Tracks and paths are ways .. not single nodes.

This 'pass' it self looks to be further west on the LPI Base Map... and on the imagery the present location looks to be a high point. I have used place=locality with name= * Pass for some of these where they are not in OSM terms 'mountain_pass'.

Hi,
What is the source of this information?

The NSW topo map has the peak further south and ele 723...

relation/11661078 - residential area does not need to be a relation. And it has an error - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.75714&lat=-32.91143&zoom=15.

I would delete the relation - leaving the ways. then tag the ways are residential areas.

Hi
relation/11059727 has touching outer members. This causes problems - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.20479&lat=-35.34921&zoom=13.

Don't see any reason why the outers are all part of the relation, if they are sim[p[le areas then they can be tagged on the ways alone. Think there is only one with inners that then needs to be in the relation.

Note! Maxar imagery also used in this change set for the most recent information.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The relation for building=house rel_id: 11562066 is not quite correct. The outer way way_id: 842499113 has the same tags as the relation. Remove the tags from hte outerway. Reason: the outer way would have all of the area as a building where as the relation has a hole in it.

A small improvement in mapping 'square' things (made of right angles) is to press the q key when the object is highlighted. This should 'square' all the corners making it look better.

Hi,

OSM is not the place to add phantom data.
Various of your entries have been removed as they do not exist. Please only add things that are there.

No response. Deleted.

Suggestion:
Delete the relation and its ways.

Make a new way for the residential area.

Hi,
way/846975535 (building) has a problem...
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.58123&lat=-33.42055&zoom=18

I was trying to indicate that the landuse is forestry ... rather than simply trees as is assumed by some from the tag landuse=forest. I did this on nodes (not ways) with the tag landuse=forestry.
There are 2 NSW Forestry Corporation areas that are not tree production areas, one is a sawmill the other PR.
Note: I now have OSMand render landuse=forest different from natural=wood so these areas are now quite evident to me with that app. It is not my 'best choice' for rendering it but it will do until I find another way.

Hi,

The relation does not from a closed area.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.91396&lat=-42.58331&zoom=13

Hi,
For Tuckwell Park sports .. I take it soccer is no longer played here in winter? The tagging for it was removed in this changeset.

Hi
The building name "house" is not a name but a description.
Name should be names ONLY. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Deleted.

Hi,
The changeset comment should describe what has been done.
For this changeset it looks like "align unnamed secondary highway".
It would be good to have a true name for this highway (not a description).