Hi,

Three things...

The changeset comment is not very descriptive.... see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

The name should not be an abbreviation see osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

The source is OSM .. I don't think the the geospacial accuracy can be improved using it.

Hi
Removal of the outer way/318672900 for this tree area has also stopped it being rendered.

Restored.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Removal of way/318672901 from the wood relation has removed the outer way for this area ... meaning it is not there...
I have restored the way to the relation so it is now correct and should render.

Take care, keep mapping.

No response. Deleted.

Hi

Building way/853560579 has;

duplicated segfments

crosses other buildings...

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.37443&lat=-31.10353&zoom=18&opacity=0.64

You should repair this.

Sorry - one is a simple way (not a node).

Hi,

The relation has 2 outer ways that share segments - this is a no no.

There are two entries for this one feature ... both 'Surface Hill Historic Reserve - one is a simple node... OSM says - one feature = one entry. ??? and the tags don't make much sense to me?

landuse forest - so used to get timber?
site_type mineral_extraction???
and
Historic Reserve... which matches the Parks Vic as the operator...
It may have been it the past forestry and/or mining. But tag what it is now.
So what is it now?

I'd delete the relation and leave the simple way.

Hi,

The multipolygon relation/11635213 is not good. The inner touches the outer .. that is a no no.

Better to delete the relation. Then create 3 simple ways for the 3 separate scrub areas.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments... And that is not the way to do building consisting of parts ... see
building:part=*

So ... make a simple way for the base of the building and tag that building=yes (or whatever) and then make simple ways for the different parts of the building tagged building:part=yes (or whatever). Note the details are on the wiki for levels/heights...

Hi,

Welcome to OSm...

There is a path inside a building ...???
See changeset/89779926#map=19/-31.97939/116.01751

Hi
The changes to the creek have broken 2administration boundaries... repaired.

Hi,

1) the state park
Multipolygons outers cannot share ways ... that is one outer way cannot overlay another outer way...

2) overlaps of state park with state forest?
As the state forest is now the state park? would it not be simpler to take the present relation of the state forest and make that the state park???

Hi,
the way/52349183 that you deleted is part of the relation for a retail area...
part reversion of this changeset to restore it.

Reverted.

Broke 4 admin boundaries.

Fence does not replace the land use for the church property, nor does the fence fully enclose the property - must be a gate some where....

Hi,
Further boundaries fixed... should be the end of them, at least as far as OSMinspector has at the moment.

I have also modified the tree areas so they stop at the murray river rather than the admin boundaries. This should make the murray river render as water only rather than the combination of both water and trees.

1) changeset comment does not relate to the change.
2) changeset source does not justify the change
3) 2 nodes related to the feature - only one is changed
4) there would be more that the 3 features at this location? Why are they not mapped?
5) details of feature are not mapped e.g. operating hours
6) past reputation of the mapper.

All the above leads to suspicion that the mapper has not reformed. Suggestion? Use mapillary to justify the changes.

Hi
Partial reversion to restore scrub area way/219762726. Looks to have no effect on admin boundaries?

Reverted.

Hi,

There is a self intersection of the relation for Port Sorell Conservation Area.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.55936&lat=-41.17342&zoom=17

HI,

Some of these are shared with park and administration boundaries (unfortunately). Be careful ...

In NSW I have (I think) removed, some of them at least, from these other boundaries. Good luck.