Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 85351400 | To use your words ... "unverifiable edits of Way: 805165237 and agree on consensus before making any further changes." Rather offensive is it not?
--------------------
Suggest the use of the LPI Base Map that suggests a different course and also names this stream. It is possible that a culvert also exists in your mapped location, and in several other places, but the LPI Base Map suggests the major/lower part of the water course takes another course. |
|
| 46160196 | Thanks, fixed. |
|
| 81930884 | Oh, water direction can usually be had as the water way usually gets wider further down as more water ways join in. I have only had one that went over a saddle so flowed in both directions from the saddle down on either side. |
|
| 81930884 | Hi,
I too use JOSM, humm the OTM is in the list of images that can be enabled... it is not enabled on my install. I'll have to consult on it (DWG?)... but as I say it does not look compatible... Reversion is a last option, and easy to revert a revert. |
|
| 80276521 | Hi,
|
|
| 85635421 | Hi,
|
|
| 85592293 | Partial reversion to restore relation. Ways 405828369, 405828362 restored together with their nodes. |
|
| 84867434 | You look to be an infrequent editor. So I have repaired this way in the interests of the map. Please take more care in future with the warnings given when attempting to add data to the map. |
|
| 85223123 | I note that these problems are still present and you continue to map. Please fix these problems. |
|
| 85524251 | Hi,
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.56163&lat=-33.55302&zoom=18 |
|
| 81930884 | Hi,
As you have failed to respond to my previous comment I am tempted to simply revert all your change sets with OpenTopoMap listed as a source. |
|
| 85001393 | Hi,
|
|
| 28643542 | Hi, These are tagged with source:name=* .. but there is no name=*. Possibly better as source:building=*??? |
|
| 53966601 | In the middle of the street?
|
|
| 85354888 | Hi, highway=path are not supposed to be wide enough to take a motor car. Usually assumed motorvehicle=no, just as a footpath is assumed to be motorvehicle=no. |
|
| 82126608 | Reverted. |
|
| 82146995 | Reverted. |
|
| 65883024 | Hi
|
|
| 82147976 | Reverted |
|
| 82147725 | Reverted |