OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
85351400

To use your words ... "unverifiable edits of Way: 805165237 and agree on consensus before making any further changes." Rather offensive is it not?
---------------------------------
I leave it to you to correct your work.

--------------------
The way you have tagged as a culvert is not verifiable from the sources listed.

Suggest the use of the LPI Base Map that suggests a different course and also names this stream. It is possible that a culvert also exists in your mapped location, and in several other places, but the LPI Base Map suggests the major/lower part of the water course takes another course.

46160196

Thanks, fixed.

81930884

Oh, water direction can usually be had as the water way usually gets wider further down as more water ways join in. I have only had one that went over a saddle so flowed in both directions from the saddle down on either side.

81930884

Hi,
Thanks for the responses!

I too use JOSM, humm the OTM is in the list of images that can be enabled... it is not enabled on my install. I'll have to consult on it (DWG?)... but as I say it does not look compatible...

Reversion is a last option, and easy to revert a revert.

80276521

Hi,
Unfortunately the key 'place=*' is for named objects only.

amenity=marketplace?
or
highway=pedestrian.

85635421

Hi,
There are a number of duplicated nodes that need to be fixed in this waterway.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.11350&lat=-27.49800&zoom=16

85592293

Partial reversion to restore relation. Ways 405828369, 405828362 restored together with their nodes.

84867434

You look to be an infrequent editor. So I have repaired this way in the interests of the map. Please take more care in future with the warnings given when attempting to add data to the map.

85223123

I note that these problems are still present and you continue to map. Please fix these problems.

85524251

Hi,
There are problems with the relation/11125986

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.56163&lat=-33.55302&zoom=18

81930884

Hi,
OpenTopmap looks to be incompatible for use within OSM. Specifically the STRM data is for private use only, the OpenTopoMap is CC-BY-SA.

As you have failed to respond to my previous comment I am tempted to simply revert all your change sets with OpenTopoMap listed as a source.

85001393

Hi,
Administrative boundaries cannot be found on satellite imagery.
Please state the source of these administrative boundaries.
--------------------------------
你好
在衛星圖像上找不到管理邊界。
請說明這些管理界限的來源。

28643542

Hi,

These are tagged with source:name=* .. but there is no name=*. Possibly better as source:building=*???

53966601

In the middle of the street?
Deleted. There are blubbers already mapped to the north east and south west.

85354888

Hi,

highway=path are not supposed to be wide enough to take a motor car. Usually assumed motorvehicle=no, just as a footpath is assumed to be motorvehicle=no.

82126608

Reverted.

82146995

Reverted.

65883024

Hi
I believe wikipedia copyright is not compatible with OSM.

82147976

Reverted

82147725

Reverted