OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
85223123

Hi,
Two problems with this change set.
relation/11101137 - scrub has duplicate segments.

relation/11101134 has a member whose role should be inner.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=117.08008&lat=-33.66698&zoom=12

84860653

Sorry .. link
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.18788&lat=-41.52896&zoom=18

way/801445623 doubles back on itself..

84860653

I would think you would be interested in fixing this error?

84189109

Thank you for confirming that you are getting notifications of changeset comments. Saves me from contacting the DWG. I note this also confirms you are ignoring my comments on errors.

You will note that the relation is not rendering so deleting it will have no effect on the rendered map, it simply removes it from the error report.
As it takes longer to make comment on your changesets in the hope that you will fix the error .. and you don't look to be doing that I will cease making the comments in your case as it is a waste of my time.
The fastest option for me is deletion without comment. The better option is for you to correct these minor errors. They can be found at the website that I have provided, daily refreshed ~8pm.

84761762

The link
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.88852&lat=-36.13901&zoom=18

highlights where duplicate segments occur in the relation/11073972.

These duplicate segments are an error for a single building.

To me that structure looks to be several individual buildings with 3 connecting walk ways. I would not use a relation at all, just tag the individual ways.

84189109

I have no interest in continuing to fix your errors.

Shall I simply delete than from now on?

85041366

As you don't seem to be interested in fixing your errors shall I simply delete the entries in error?

84548330

As you don't seem to be interested in repairing your errors shall I simply delete the entry in error?

84959016

Error on wood - way/791645085.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10734&lat=-27.48594&zoom=14

84860653

Error on way/801445623.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.18734&lat=-41.AC&zoom=18

84453210

Corrected tagging - removed campsite from relation/1388318 and added back in natural=wood.
There have been no additions to the relation - as either inners or outers by this changeset.

84867434

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
The building you created (way/801477955) has an error.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.47029&lat=-35.37319&zoom=17

84761762

Error.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.88852&lat=-36.13901&zoom=18

Duplicate segments in relation/11073972

84737677

way/800624999 has shared segments... that is an error.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.31640&lat=-38.27728&zoom=15

84398459

Park boundaries done.
Administration boundaries I will leave for the next round of updates. Note that anything attached to them will be changed at that time.

84017156

Note .. this is nit picking .. don't be too worried by it.

Looking closer...

relation/11029434
tags:
building school
type multipolygon
member
way/264931804 as outer

Relation: Rodrigo Hall (11029433)
tags
building school
description Indoor basketball court used for assemblies and musicals.
name Rodrigo Hall
type multipolygon

member
way/264931804 as outer

----------------------------------
Both these relation use the same way - they are duplicates.

relation/11029434 should be deleted as the information is already duplicated in Relation: Rodrigo Hall (11029433).

Relation: Rodrigo Hall (11029433) can also be deleted if its tags are placed on to way/264931804.

84017156

Ok. The relationship 11029434 is now a one member relation, it would be simpler without the relation - a simple way.

84189109

The relation outer is self crossing...

See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.64158&lat=-34.94093&zoom=17

Tag area=yes is not required on the inner way of the relation.

84558682

Hi,

Welcome to OSM. Some corrections and ideas.

Holes are not members of the relation for the golf course, they are simply enclosed by it as are parking areas, the club house, trees etc etc. The enclosure is enough.

Please remove the holes as members in the relation, they should be left as ways. Note they don't render.

Improvements? The present boundary of the golf course includes houses. These should be excluded using the LPI Base Map.

Good luck.

84017156

Err No.
As of right now (checked with JOSM);

relation/11029434 has shared outer segments

relation/11029429 has shared outer segments. Additionally a way is duplicated within the relation i.e. it appears twice.

See http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.96835&lat=-27.15172&zoom=18

Both these relations need to be fixed.