Sorry, I meant a landuse=meadow relation

Please, be aware you broke this landuse=farmland relation relation/15977228
I suggest to enable the OSM validation, it would have shown this kind of errors

Hello ToprakM,
I noticed a huge increase in the hydro network in this part of Cyprus and I came across your changeset.
Reading your source I see "Kitchener's Survey of Cyprus". If I'm not wrong is an ancient book written 150 years ago.
Knowing a bit how much the climate changed in Mediterranean Sea in the last 150 years, I wonder how much that book could be still considered as a trusted source for some mapping nowadays.
I got a message from some colleagues who work inside the Buffer Zone, and were a bit surprised by that big increase.

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

a dam is this osm.wiki/Tag%3Awaterway%3Ddam
Probably you wanted map a man_made=water_well osm.wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dwater_well or, for animals, a amenity=watering_place ? iD editor sometimes doesn't suggest the right tag. I would suggest to familiarize with the OSM tags looking at the wiki section.

Cheers,
Alessandro

Hello,
may I suggest to make a little smaller changeset, as this one spans 2 Continents?
Thank you, cheers
Alessandro

Hello,
may I suggest to make a little smaller changeset, as this one spans 4 Continents?
Thank you, cheers
Alessandro

Hello,
just a question: why you draw trapezoidal buildings when they are rectangular?

Hello,
sorry, why you deleted this huge relation
relation/15736220
It took a lot of working hours to build. Please, be careful when you delete something

Hello Isaac,
I suggest to check the result after the upload when you work in data dense environment: you left, at least, a broken boundary.

Cheers,
Alessandro

Hello,
please try to draw squared building (when they are); I see you are applying the same weird geometry to all the building.

Cheers,
Alessandro

Hello,
give descriptive name to object is not correct (name=apron), is like name=road

Cheers

Hello Marcello,
building=yes + natural=water ?

Oops, sorry mate

Hello,
I'm contacting you because I realized you changed the military part of the Brindisi's airport perimeter from military=base to military=airfield

As you can clearly see there is no
runways inside the landuse=military

The airport's runways are used for 99,999% by civilian traffic It can happens, maybe once for 1 or 2 year a military plane land here. All the military operation were moved many years ago to the Gioa del Colle's military airport
osm.org/#map=14/40.7692/16.9337

Finally, wouldn't it be a bit strange that a major Italian airport, would be mapped in a wrong way? Maybe would be better contact the local community before doing this important changes.

Best Regards,
Alessandro

P.S.: I work inside the airport, and I can assure you about the situation I just described

Hello,
please note natural=shrub is not a valid tag, Use natural=scrub instead

Cheers,
Alessandro

There are some not useful lines in the area.
It seems were some service Bounding Box, because they have "id","bottom","left","right","top" attributes.
Please, delete them if are not really useful

There are some not useful lines in the area.
It seems were some service Bounding Box, because they have "id","bottom","left","right","top" attributes.
Please, delete them if are not really useful

Hello,
in this changeset I noticed you added some duplicated place names (e.g.: Kasambya B, Ntunga, Minana, Butohyo, Butera), and this wrong name: "-1726799 Buhuhira GNS PPL no population estimate available, defaulted to village populated place village".
Before import data is always reccomended to check and clean these data, otherwise bada data remain on OSM database for years decreasing the quality of this, very valuable, database.

Cheers,
Alessandro

Hello,
I see you have deleted the super relation for Asian Highway Network A1 (running from Tokio to Istanbul).
Please, check osm.wiki/Asia/Asian_Highway_Network before add or delete something related to these long relations.
I'm going to restore the deleted relation.

Cheers
Alessandro

Hello,
while I was monitoring the area, I came across with your edits.
At this long (44km) way way/127706343 you added tracktype=5
Checking the road, I could imagine you mapped on the west side of the road.
In that side according to tracktype=*?uselang=en , IMHO tracktype could be 3 or 4.
But if you follow the road to the East tracktype it's 2 or 3.
For the future, let me suggest to split the roads applying the tag only on the part you see.

Best Regards, and happy mapping.
Alessandro