Good day. May I ask why you removed the toll=yes tag here?

All hikers, cyclists and motorbikes are required to pay a toll when using this trail.

It would be possible to map this scenario with conditional access tags.

Something along the lines of (just used random times for the example):
foot=no + foot:conditional=yes @ Su 05:00-12:00 + bicycle:conditional=yes @ Su 05:00-12:00 + motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ Su 05:00-12:00

Good morning. Just for clarification, this way is usable by bicycles but not for motorbikes? Thanks!

Good afternoon and welcome back!

Just some small reminders about tagging conventions:

- To map who or what a streets is named after please use name:etymology:wikidata/wikipedia. Only use wikidata/wikipedia on streets if the the streets itself has a wikidata object and wikipedia article (see: name:etymology=*)

- The main name tag should contain the name variant that is most commonly used on signage, for addresses and so on. Very long forms of a name that are only rarely used in everyday life are better suited for official_name tag

- Highway=unclassified despite its name is a a classification that is widely used for roads that are more important than residential streets but not important enough for tertiary classification (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions#Classifications)

Thanks for continuing to help improving OSM

Good day, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits!

Looks like you had some issues mapping this bridge closure. Bridges are often mapped as two separate objects, one for the bridge itself (way/1124403267) and one for the road (way/117836837) that goes across the bridge.

To indicate that the bridge is closed access tags (access=*) need to be added to the road.

I added access=no for now but if the bridge is still usable by pedestrians at the moment then this exception could be tagged with an additional foot=yes.

node/13605403143

Good afternoon. The point-of-interest that you added is already uploaded to OpenStreetMap. It doesn't need approval but other mappers can make changes and add more details.

I removed the promotional description and moved some of the information to start_date and contact:youtube. I also changed the category from amenity=events_venue to office=company as this seems to be more fitting and made some other minor tagging improvements.

Please kindly double-check if everything looks right and feel free to add more details or update data in the future.

Thanks for contribtuting to OSM!

Possibly this could be tagged as amenity=taxi + taxi_vehicle=auto_rickshaw (see: taxi_vehicle=*)

Good morning. It looks like you accidentally dragged some building nodes here and mixed up tags of several different objects.

Based on the tag changes that you made it seems that you tried to move a computer repair shop from a building in Berkeley Heights to a new building (Unitown Center) in Sitio Aratan? I tried to fix the issues in this changeset: changeset/179013685

Please kindly double-check position and tags of the two buildings and the computer repair shop. Thanks!

Thanks for catching this, moved the value from shop to name.

Good day, I'm using this tag to indicate that nearby settlement with identical name exists and is not a mapping error.

Good day,

I noticed that you added motor_vehicle=no on the streets here. This would mean that even residents of the neighbourhood are not allowed to drive there. A more suitable tagging would be access=private or motor_vehicle=private (the latter if pedestrians and bicycles are allowed to freely use the private roads).

Also you deleted several street names (for example on way 218689526), I assume by accident? Could you please restore these?

Best regards,
Timmy

Thanks for your reply.

When used together with route=ferry access tags indicate which modes of transport are allowed to use the ferry.

Cars and motorcycles can't drive underwater but they can drive on and off the ship.

Please have a look at the wiki page for this: route=ferry

Hello Eduardo. I'm curious what the intentions behind this changeset are.

Did you recently survey this ferry route and found the existing access tags to be incorrect?

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you use the "add place" function it will be added to a community-built global data base. Please only add places like for example convenience stores and agrarian shops that really exist. For personal bookmark Organic Maps has a separate function, just press "Save" at the bottom of the screen.

Hey. It looks like you accidentally removed the building tag for some of the barangay halls. Also the government=yes tag does not seem to be meaningful as townhalls are government institutions by definition. The government=* tag is intended for use in combination with office=government but "yes" value would also not really contain any additional information.

government=*

Keep up the awesome edits! 😊

Good day. What sources are you using to add access tags here and in various other recent edits? If you have local knowledge or if you're using ground-level imagery of these places please mention this in your changesets.

Legal access=destination restrictions are almost non-existent in the Philippines. For public roads surface attributes are usually sufficient to discourage through-routing and in case of gated neighbourhoods the appropriate restricton is almost always access=private.

For Malungon-Tampakan Road revert to secondary seems fine as significant sections are still narrow and rough (surface=unpaved still needs to be restored).

Surallah-Banga-Polomolok Road needs to be reviewed as well, afaik there are also some unfinished sections left which make primary classification questionable.

As for Matanao-Columbio-Marbel Road I most recently changed it back to primary myself based on ground survey and local knowledge. Construction has recently been completed and this link is now both the shortest and fastest route from Davao Region to Marbel. Despite still being designated as a provincial road it's built to the same specifications as national highways and conversion has been requested by DPWH RO XI/XII for many years already.

Good morning. May I ask what source you used to map these bus stops? Are these just planned/proposed or are they already verifiable on the ground?

Good evening. Private information like names of residents should not be mapped in OSM. For more details see: osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information