This changeset has been reverted. footway=sidewalk indicates that a highway=footway is adjacent to a road:

footway=sidewalk

Please don't delete valid data from OSM.

Thank you.

Changeset comment was supposed to read:

Named streams Lachlan Valley batch #1

Reverted in changeset #43295807

The correct fix to the Stockdill Drive problem is to delete the incorrect turn restrictions:

changeset/43297866

Reverted in changeset #43297774

Each node on a power line way needs a tower or pole tag (power=line).

You seem to have created about a 1000 new Osmose warnings in NSW:

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=16210&item=7040&class=4

I don't understand what the point of this changeset is. The footpaths you deleted are visible in the 2016 aerial imagery. Are you saying that they have been removed?

And what is "sidewalk tag is always available if people need it" supposed to mean? You haven't added any sidewalk tags in this changeset.

You do realise that these all need to be connected to the appropriate waterways?

You appear to have added about 50 "new suburb in A.C.T"

These are not lakes rather they are salt pans ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_pan_(geology) )

GNB says Jews Creek:

http://www.gnb.nsw.gov.au/place_naming/placename_search/extract?id=MaYbBKWAKW

I'm guessing that 4.5 km long culvert don't really exist:

way/441745279

Sydney a6?

This dataset is CC 4.0 we only have general permission for CC 2.5 and CC 3.0 from data.gov.au. If you want to use CC 4.0 you have to get explicit permission (see: https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg10410.html).

Getting permission is only the first step you should be following the osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines of which the first step is getting Community buy in (ie: sign up to the local mail list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au and let others know what you are planning to do).

So, it's been a month and I can't find any sign on the wiki that you've received permission to use this data set. Do you have a link to it?

Stop importing Landgate data. There is NO Landgate data set that is compatible with the OSM licence.

As far as I can tell this data is from here:

http://catalogue.beta.data.wa.gov.au/dataset/building-footprints

It is licensed with these conditions:

http://slip.landgate.wa.gov.au/Pages/SLIP-Personal-Licence-Use.aspx

which is most definitely not compatible with OSM.

Hmm, buildings "traced" with exactly the same geometry and carefully tagged with heights and elevations to the nearest mm. Smells like an import to me. Have you followed any of the guidelines:

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Less wonky street, more whole area being redeveloped.

Hi,

If you are mapping in NSW would you please use the LPI Imagery in preference to the Bing, you'll find it is clearer and more accurate.

Thanks.

Hi

If you are mapping in NSW/ACT would you please use the NSW LPI in preference to the Bing Imagery, you'll find that it is clearer and more accurate. In iD you'll find it in the Background settings menu on the right.

Thanks