If you are mapping in NSW please use the NSW LPI Imagery and not the Bing Imagery

Thanks.

If you are mapping in NSW please use the NSW LPI Imagery and not the Bing Imagery

Thanks.

This is an import. Did you follow any of the Import Guidelines (osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines)?

This data set is CC 4.0 and as a result requires explicit permission from GA to use in OSM.

So a few points then:

1. You are doing an import without following the import guidelines:

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

2. Have you got explicit permission to use the GA dataset?

3. Combining place with admin_level=10 is not unusual:

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/admin_level=10#combinations

Admin_level=10 in Europe is not the same thing as Australia.

4. What are you trying to say here: "It is much better to put Locality boundaries at the locally-accepted Locality"?

5. You didn't explain why you put noname=yes on the relations.

And why did you add noname=yes to all of the admin_level=10 relations? And why did you delete the place tags?

Is there any reason why you are not using the LPI NSW Imagery? It should be available in JOSM at the bottom of the Imagery Menu.

Suspect that you are not updating your changeset comments before uploading.

Another thing, if you are doing mapping in NSW would you please use the LPI NSW Imagery rather than Bing. For example way/50329674 is now in the wrong place.

What does "#hotosm-project-1997" supposed to mean?

Google imagery says no...plus a bunch of other changes. So a survey would be good.

Did you get permission from Landgate to use this dataset? Under their licence you are not allowed to upload this:

http://slip.landgate.wa.gov.au/Documents/SLIPTransactionPersonalUseLicence.pdf

Yeap this is one of many bulk edits this user has done where they have deleted source=nearmap for no apparent reason.

Did you get permission from Landgate to use this data? Under their licence you are not allowed to upload this:

http://slip.landgate.wa.gov.au/Documents/SLIPTransactionPersonalUseLicence.pdf

What was the point of this changeset?

What was the point of this changeset? All you've done is deleted all of the source=nearmap tags. How do you know that these weren't from nearmap? What is source=aaronsta supposed to mean?

Good-O. I won't bother then.

I didn't change the place tags on any of these only the place:nswgnb:

http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=113764320

Personally if a place doesn't make it onto the list of UCLs:

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/05773C1D8C9F2022CA257A98001399F7?opendocument

I'd tag locality.

Can I assume that you're fixing these:

http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/unmapped#7/-33.551/146.096

?

Thanks for fixing that.

I've been noticing quite a few of these being added by this user:

@Lake%20Leung/history

but I hadn't got round to fixing them yet.

I'm not putting new developments in.

I just checked the local real estate website to see if they had been finished ie: are there now properties for sale.

It has been finished:

http://investment.infrastructure.gov.au/projects/ProjectDetails.aspx?Project_id=050891-13NSW-NP

but it's been a while since I've been on the Barton so I don't know what was built.

No. Currently for sale on AllHomes.