If anyone believes that this deletion was incorrect (and this is more than 'just private grassland fields with a mown strip for occasional private use' ) please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "[Ticket#2023110710000244] Airstrip 143757411".
Best Regards,
Andy

If anyone believes that this deletion was incorrect (and this is more than 'just private grassland fields with a mown strip for occasional private use' ) please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "[Ticket#2023110710000244] Airstrip 143757558".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Rather than just arguing amongst yourselves about the name and tagging of https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1D5N , I'd suggest discussing it at the German forum. The name is a bit descriptive, but the English equivalent does have some tagged like that: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=winding+hole#values .
Hallo,
Anstatt nur untereinander über den Namen und die Kennzeichnung von https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1D5N zu streiten, würde ich vorschlagen, darüber im deutschen Forum zu diskutieren. Der Name ist ein wenig beschreibend, aber das englische Äquivalent hat einige solche Tags: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=winding+hole#values .

Is your changeset comment here is supposed to be funny?
If so, I don't think that that "humour" will be appreciated by anyone here.
Soll Ihr Changeset-Kommentar hier lustig sein?
Wenn ja, glaube ich nicht, dass dieser „Humor“ von irgendjemandem hier geschätzt wird.

Hello,
Where things have closed I'd suggest tagging as "disused:aeroway" rather than adding "closed" to the name.
Best Regards, Andy

Based on the images posted above, it does look more like a "garden" than a "park" to me.

Hello,
Just wondered - was it deliberate to use "place=county" on this "boundary=historic_county"? Other examples such as relation/15698591 don't have it; another one relation/16300459 has place=historic:county. Currently there are two Waterfords:

> osm_id | name
> -----------+--------------------
> -16649259 | County Waterford
> -283426 | County Waterford

Hello josh_joplin_lp,

What actually is way/945979361 ? It doesn't seem to have any tags on it. Also, what is a "lanelet" relation/12745856 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

It is true that most most offices in the UK aren't operated by the Post Office directly. Are there any of the changes here in NI that are definitely _wrong_ - i.e. a PO branch is operated by "Post Office Limited" (the company, owned by the UK government) rather than individual franchisees?

In the context of England, Wales or Scotland, the "brand:website" isn't especially relevant currently, but in the context of Ireland it obviously is - see e.g. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CTl . However, adding individual websites for the NI ones is a laudable goal. Currently 34 in NI do have websites https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CTj and 213 do not https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CTk . Is filling in the missing ones (to replace the removed operator/brand:website) still ongoing?

Best Regards,
Andy (following a query to the Data Working Group)

Cześć,
Tutaj Andy z Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM.

> Jestem edytorem map a nie powieściopisarzem.

Nikt nie spodziewa się tu głębi prozy Josepha Conrada – coś w stylu Johna Steinbecka byłoby w porządku, ale proszę, spróbuj za każdym razem użyć _trochę_ więcej szczegółów niż w „Aktualizacji”?
Z wyrazami szacunku,
Andy

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.

> Jestem edytorem mapy a nie powieściopisarzem.

No-one's expecting the depth of prose of Joseph Conrad here - something on the John Steinbeck side of things would be fine, but please, try and use a _little_ more detail than "Aktualizacja" every time?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hallo Ttobi,
Andy von der Datenarbeitsgruppe von OSM hier. Vielen Dank für Ihre Aktualisierungen, aber es wäre wirklich hilfreich, wenn Sie zur Beschreibung jedes Einzelnen ein paar weitere Wörter als nur „Eigene Feststellung“ verwenden könnten. Ich bezweifle nicht, dass dieser Kommentar korrekt ist – nur dass ein bisschen mehr Details zu Ihrer Arbeit für andere Mapper sehr hilfreich wären.
Beste grüße,
Andy

Hello ttobi,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. Thanks for your updates, but it'd be really helpful if you can use a few more words other than just "Eigene Feststellung" to describe each one. I don't doubt that that comment is accurate - just that a bit more detail about what you were doing would be really helpful to other mappers.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Puxim,

You've written "Correction of road category and number" here, but as previously noted by a previous contributor at changeset/141516498 the roads in Wantage have been changed. You can see a picture of the new signage at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.589077618021&lng=-1.4198422618224&z=16.866703450277612&pKey=299581368502756&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap .

Please do add a comment to this changeset (or the other one) acknowledging that you have seen this message. If you have any questions, you can email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "[Ticket#2023110410000081] Puxim".
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

> Finalmente, el usuario parece no esperar a ninguna respuesta sobre esta discusión y ha cambiado la vía a parque nuevamente

... and you've changed it back!

Привет, iWowik!
Здесь Энди из рабочей группы по данным OSM. Мы получили несколько жалоб на некоторые ваши изменения. Одним из примеров является way/760469289/history. Что именно было источником ваших изменений? Вы добавили «улица Освенения» и «Просвещения улица» — было высказано предположение, что это всего лишь переводы, а не имена, и поэтому они вообще не относятся к OSM.
Обратите внимание, что написание русской и польской вики-страниц организации, в честь которой названа эта улица, отличается от вашего: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE% D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0 и https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proswita .
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Энди

Hello iWowik,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. We've received a couple of complaints about some of your changes. One example is way/760469289/history . What exactly was the source of your change there? You added "ulica Oświecenia" and "Просвещения улица" - it has been suggested that those are just translations rather than names, and therefore don't actually belong in OSM at all.
Note that the spelling of the Russian and Polish wiki pages for the organisation that this street is named after is different to yours: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0 and https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proswita .
Best Regards,
Andy

Як видно з напр. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/737319140 , назва:ru неодноразово піддавалася механічним редагуванням.
Було припущено, що ряд значень name:ru по всій Україні були поганою транслітерацією оригінальної української назви (хоча https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/737319140, схоже, мав її name:uk і name: ru додав одночасно).
Ми (DWG) знаємо, що деякі зміни назв в Україні (наприклад, вулиці, названі на честь російського народу, змінені на назви українського народу) були скасовані деякими мапперами - заявка DWG для цього Ticket#2023102010000113 .
Якщо будь-які «name:ru» були спочатку додані як «погана транслітерація українських імен», і там дійсно немає дійсного name:ru взагалі, тоді, будь ласка, надішліть електронною поштою data@openstreetmap.org з деталями.

As can be seen from e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/737319140 , the name:ru has been repeatedly subject to mechanical edits.
It has been suggested that a number of name:ru values across Ukraine were poor transliterations from an original Ukrainian name (although https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/737319140 seems to have had its name:uk and name:ru added at the same time).
We (the DWG) are aware that some name changes in Ukraine (e.g. streets named after Russian people being changed to being named after Ukrainian people) have been undone by some mappers - the DWG ticket for that is Ticket#2023102010000113 .
If any "name:ru" were originally added as "poor transliterations of Ukrainian names", and there really isn't a valid name:ru there at all, then please email data@openstreetmap.org with details.

Hola,

Estoy escribiendo este mensaje a los dos participantes en la "guerra de edición" en https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/601817622.

Es evidente que no está de acuerdo sobre cómo se debe etiquetar esto. Sin embargo, no he visto ningún comentario de ninguno de ustedes explicando por qué creen que su etiqueta (parque o jardín) es correcta.

Si alguno de ustedes puede vincular imágenes (tal vez de Mapillary o Bing StreetSide, si están disponibles) que respalden por qué cree que es mejor etiquetarlas de cierta manera, vincúlelas.

Atentamente,

Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.