OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
104083849

Hi, please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

104017747

Resolved issues from this in 104037858 & 104034198

104017747

Is the area actually retail? Looks residential to me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104017747

103984008

Hi, footway=access_aisle may be what you're after in the parking lot.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103984008

103330559

Pedestrian area looks good now - I fixed up the crossings at NE roundabout in 103372947
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103330559

103157790

This has been resolved

103300776

It's name is probably just "Mobil" as it was originally. It's designated as a petrol station by `amenity=fuel`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103300776

103239500

Did the guidance on needing footways inside pedestrian areas change to be no longer required?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103239500

103146938

Hi, the comment you left is different to what you actually did (which was add 1 new path).
Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103146938

103157790

Hi, please use `addr:housenumber` instead of `name`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103157790

102906270

Hi, layer=-1 on that church seems incorrect. You can connect the path to the building with an entrance tag instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102906270

102852200

Hi, none of the roads you added connect to the existing road network.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102852200

102851828

Hi, roads added here clash with changeset/102852034

102768872

I have fixed this.

102768872

Hi, use addr:housenumber instead of "name=Num 6". Similarly for surrounding houses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102768872

102471391

Most recent imagery (~3 months old) does not show any buildings of that size.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102471391

102458863

Fair enough, didn't see that one. I guess there's no standard consensus because the rest of NSW is mapped on suburb boundaries.

101892497

Hi, looks nice but please note that glueing landuse to roads is almost always incorrect
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101892497

101293070

They're easy to miss, would be an interesting problem to try and solve for a validator.

101185055

I never questioned the driveway to footway connections, I meant not connecting them to the landuse as the end node.