ScottWalkerAU's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 104083849 | Hi, please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 104017747 | Resolved issues from this in 104037858 & 104034198 |
|
| 104017747 | Is the area actually retail? Looks residential to me.
|
|
| 103984008 | Hi, footway=access_aisle may be what you're after in the parking lot.
|
|
| 103330559 | Pedestrian area looks good now - I fixed up the crossings at NE roundabout in 103372947
|
|
| 103157790 | This has been resolved |
|
| 103300776 | It's name is probably just "Mobil" as it was originally. It's designated as a petrol station by `amenity=fuel`
|
|
| 103239500 | Did the guidance on needing footways inside pedestrian areas change to be no longer required?
|
|
| 103146938 | Hi, the comment you left is different to what you actually did (which was add 1 new path).
|
|
| 103157790 | Hi, please use `addr:housenumber` instead of `name`.
|
|
| 102906270 | Hi, layer=-1 on that church seems incorrect. You can connect the path to the building with an entrance tag instead.
|
|
| 102852200 | Hi, none of the roads you added connect to the existing road network.
|
|
| 102851828 | Hi, roads added here clash with changeset/102852034 |
|
| 102768872 | I have fixed this. |
|
| 102768872 | Hi, use addr:housenumber instead of "name=Num 6". Similarly for surrounding houses.
|
|
| 102471391 | Most recent imagery (~3 months old) does not show any buildings of that size.
|
|
| 102458863 | Fair enough, didn't see that one. I guess there's no standard consensus because the rest of NSW is mapped on suburb boundaries. |
|
| 101892497 | Hi, looks nice but please note that glueing landuse to roads is almost always incorrect
|
|
| 101293070 | They're easy to miss, would be an interesting problem to try and solve for a validator. |
|
| 101185055 | I never questioned the driveway to footway connections, I meant not connecting them to the landuse as the end node. |