Was this meant to be "Laverty Pathology"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94170181

Are the zebra crossings you deleted no longer zebras? You only have them as "marked" now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94138332

You have lots of different overlapping multipolygons here. I see you've tried over 20 times to fix it, might pay to remove the one-member relations and start fresh
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94092199

Hi! I try to avoid connecting features to administrative boundaries as one is physical and the other is more of a concept https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/398674342
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93960133

Fixed a mistake in changeset/93893921

Hi - you realigned the road to Maxar imagery, which does not match the GPS traces as well. I believe the original alignment with DCS NSW Imagery was correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93811402

Hi - you realigned the road to Maxar imagery, which does not match the GPS traces as well. I believe the original alignment with DCS NSW Imagery was correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93811402

Hi! Wondering what the source for these are? Seems like a good change, just curious.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93675015

Reverted additions in changeset/93687571. Added a fixme stating there are roadworks underway.

Hi, this piece of road is left-only out of the retail area now. It has been like this for months now, as there is current roadworks underway. Please remove what you added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93639671

Looks good - beat me to it!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93542430

Hi! I don't understand how the end result of this change is any different to its original state? The road is now 5 separate ways instead of the original 1, with no variation in tags.
Judging from aerial imagery the turning circles at the end should have been marked as oneway=yes, instead of your oneway=no
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93478065

Resolved the broken road in changeset/93284525

Hi!
Where are these names coming from? I can't tell as you didn't list a source

Also, when doing footpaths parallel to a road (see: sidewalk). It's best to use the footway=sidewalk tag along with highway=footpath in the Tags section. (section between "Fields" and "Relations")

Hi, it's recommended to re-use existing ways instead of deleting and re-creating them. (like you did for way/173254626 - osm.wiki/Keep_the_history)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92926850

Obviously wasn't paying attention when I was fixing up the node - that the shop area was also marked as the IGA.

2hu4u fixed this up a little in 92644654
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92616903

Hi there, some of the road changes on the King St / Darby St intersection are incorrectly formed. Namely the North to west turn from Darby to King street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92923460

Hi! I see you have a relatively low changeset count, so I'll try to provide some constructive feedback.

It's good practice to not delete legitimate data even if it's not complete. Given the physical word is always changing no data can be said to be complete, so having some data is better than no data.
Surrounding suburbs have sidewalk data - so now it reads as if Mayfield has none when it in fact does.
Having the basis of the data there allows it to be extended upon more easily. e.g., if I were to come along and add more sidewalks.
Similarly, you have been adding house outlines but not every house is there, so it gives the impression there are no more houses.
As for the appearance, it's not advised to "tag for the renderer" osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Not trying to be snide, but instead provide context :)